Cited by 26Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureReinforcement Learning in RoboticsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Uncovering instabilities in variational-quantum deep Q-networks

Open access
Franz, Maja, Wolf, Lucas, Periyasamy, Maniraman, Ufrecht, Christian, Scherer, Daniel D., Plinge, Axel, Mutschler, Christopher, Mauerer, Wolfgang·2023·Journal of the Franklin Institute

Abstract

Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has considerably advanced over the past decade. At the same time, state-of-the-art RL algorithms require a large computational budget in terms of training time to converge. Recent work has started to approach this problem through the lens of quantum computing, which promises theoretical speed-ups for several traditionally hard tasks. In this work, we examine a class of hybrid quantum-classical RL algorithms that we collectively refer to as variational quantum deep Q-networks (VQ-DQN). We show that VQ-DQN approaches are subject to instabilities that cause the learned policy to diverge, study the extent to which this afflicts reproducibility of established results based on classical simulation, and perform systematic experiments to identify potential explanations for the observed instabilities. Additionally, and in contrast to most existing work on quantum reinforcement learning, we execute RL algorithms on an actual quantum processing unit (an IBM Quantum Device) and investigate differences in behaviour between simulated and physical quantum systems that suffer from implementation deficiencies. Our experiments show that, contrary to opposite claims in the literature, it cannot be conclusively decided if known quantum approaches, even if simulated without physical imperfections, can provide an advantage as compared to classical approaches. Finally, we provide a robust, universal and well-tested implementation of VQ-DQN as a reproducible testbed for future experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.08.021

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These quantum machine learning approaches need careful consideration of subtle issues that do not appear in classical algorithms and are strongly intertwined with the underlying hardware.

    “Regardless of the conditions of their advantages, these approaches need careful consideration of subtle issues (see, e.g., Refs.[112-115]) that do not appear in classical algorithms and are, in particular, strongly intertwined with the underlying hardware.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franz, M., Wolf, L., Periyasamy, M., Ufrecht, C., Scherer, D. D., Plinge, A., Mutschler, C., & Mauerer, W.
Affiliations
  • OTH Regensburg (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (DE)
Corresponding author
Franz, Maja
Venue
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
360
Issue
17
Pages
13822-13844
ISSN
0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293051376
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Franklin Institute (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N15645)
  • International Business Machines Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum reinforcement learning, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, policy divergence, training instability, reproducibility, IBM quantum hardware, quantum advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review