Uncovering instabilities in variational-quantum deep Q-networks
Open accessAbstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has considerably advanced over the past decade. At the same time, state-of-the-art RL algorithms require a large computational budget in terms of training time to converge. Recent work has started to approach this problem through the lens of quantum computing, which promises theoretical speed-ups for several traditionally hard tasks. In this work, we examine a class of hybrid quantum-classical RL algorithms that we collectively refer to as variational quantum deep Q-networks (VQ-DQN). We show that VQ-DQN approaches are subject to instabilities that cause the learned policy to diverge, study the extent to which this afflicts reproducibility of established results based on classical simulation, and perform systematic experiments to identify potential explanations for the observed instabilities. Additionally, and in contrast to most existing work on quantum reinforcement learning, we execute RL algorithms on an actual quantum processing unit (an IBM Quantum Device) and investigate differences in behaviour between simulated and physical quantum systems that suffer from implementation deficiencies. Our experiments show that, contrary to opposite claims in the literature, it cannot be conclusively decided if known quantum approaches, even if simulated without physical imperfections, can provide an advantage as compared to classical approaches. Finally, we provide a robust, universal and well-tested implementation of VQ-DQN as a reproducible testbed for future experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These quantum machine learning approaches need careful consideration of subtle issues that do not appear in classical algorithms and are strongly intertwined with the underlying hardware.
“Regardless of the conditions of their advantages, these approaches need careful consideration of subtle issues (see, e.g., Refs.[112-115]) that do not appear in classical algorithms and are, in particular, strongly intertwined with the underlying hardware.”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [114]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
Grover, L. K. (1996) · Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96 · doi:10.1145/237814.237866 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures
Bengio, Y. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement Learning That Matters
Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., & Meger, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11694 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware
Schuld, M., Bergholm, V., Gogolin, C., Izaac, J., & Killoran, N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032331 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models
Schuld, M., Sweke, R., & Meyer, J. J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032430 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier
Pérez-Salinas, A., Cervera-Lierta, A., Gil-Fuster, E., & Latorre, J. I. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-02-06-226 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Layerwise learning for quantum neural networks
Skolik, A., McClean, J. R., Mohseni, M., van der Smagt, P., & Leib, M. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00036-4 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective
Wintersperger, K., Dommert, F., Ehmer, T., Hoursanov, A., Klepsch, J., Mauerer, W., Reuber, G., Strohm, T., Yin, M., & Luber, S. (2023) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00190-1 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Franz, M., Wolf, L., Periyasamy, M., Ufrecht, C., Scherer, D. D., Plinge, A., Mutschler, C., & Mauerer, W.
- Affiliations
- OTH Regensburg (DE)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Franz, Maja
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the Franklin Institute
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 360
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 13822-13844
- ISSN
- 0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293051376
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the Franklin Institute (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N15645)
- International Business Machines Corporation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum reinforcement learning, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, policy divergence, training instability, reproducibility, IBM quantum hardware, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review