Are pharmacists’ good knowledge and awareness on antibiotics taken for granted? The situation in Albania and future implications across countries
Open accessAbstract
Objectives Irrational use of antibiotics is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), exacerbated by dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription especially for typically viral infections. Such dispensing is common despite legislation. Pharmacists play a key role in advising on medicines, especially in countries where most patients seek pharmacist help as they cannot afford both physician fees and medicines. Consequently, our objective was to ascertain pharmacists' skills and knowledge regarding antibiotics when patients present to them with typically viral infections.Methods This was a qualitative cross-sectional survey among 370 community pharmacists in Albania, with carefully selected and validated topics. The main outcome measure was knowledge of antibiotics and current legislation.Results Variable knowledge regarding antibiotics among community pharmacists. 55% knew colds are caused by viruses and 93% that antibiotics are ineffective against influenza. However, 18% believed if colds last >4 days an antibiotic can bring a patient back to work, and only 13% stated antibiotics are ineffective against viruses. Encouragingly, 93% knew penicillins can cause anaphylactic shock, 74% that antibiotics kill bacteria causing infections, and only 7% that antibiotic misuse cannot cause AMR. However, 13% stated the main disadvantage of antibiotics is that they are ineffective against viruses and 93% admitted they had no treatment protocols to consult in their daily work to direct patient care.Conclusion Encouraging signs regarding pharmacists' knowledge of antibiotics in Albania; however, concerns. Instigating educational programmes among patients and pharmacists and greater enforcement of legislation should reduce AMR rates in Albania and across countries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study in Albania found variable knowledge of community pharmacy staff towards antibiotics, with merely 13% declaring antibiotics as infective against viruses.
“other study conducted in Albania also witnessed variable knowledge of community pharmacy staff towards antibiotics, with merely 13% declaring antibiotics as infective against viruses [70].”
From No prescription? No problem: drivers of non-prescribed sale of antibiotics among community drug retail outlets in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies (2021) · cites this paper as [70]
The Abstract and Discussion report variable knowledge among community pharmacists in Albania. The Abstract says only 13% stated that antibiotics are *ineffective* against viruses; the citing sentence says “infective,” which reverses that finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Neda E, Azadeh E, Golnaz V, Mona M, Moein M, Maryam M. Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Upper Respiratory Infections (URI) in Iran: A Cross Sectional Study. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials. 2016;11(4):342-5.
- Authors
- Hoxha, I., Malaj, A., Kraja, B., Bino, S., Oluka, M., Marković-Peković, V., & Godman, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine Tirana (AL)
- Institute of Public Health (AL)
- University of Nairobi (KE)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Godman, Brian
- Venue
- Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 240-245
- ISSN
- 2213-7165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787197424
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- community pharmacists, antibiotic knowledge, antimicrobial resistance, inappropriate antibiotic use, viral infection, antibiotic misuse, pharmacy education, Albania
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Albania, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Pharmacists, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review