Barriers and facilitators to breast and colorectal cancer screening of older adults in primary care: A systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Limited funding in general, lack of time to plan or train staff, insufficient equipment or administrative support to perform additional data entry or deal with paperwork were reported as barriers.
“Limited funding in general, lack of time to plan [16] or train staff [51], insufficient equipment [3, 70] or administrative support to perform additional data entry or deal with paperwork [31, 67, 71, 72] were reported as barriers.”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [70]
Competing priorities, lack of motivation, and low awareness of the intervention were shown to impede implementation.
“Competing priorities [42, 57, 59, 62, 63, 70, 82], lack of motivation [31, 39, 42, 57, 68, 81] and low awareness of the intervention [31, 35, 38, 39, 43, 44, 68, 75, 80, 81] were shown to impede implementation.”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [70]
Resistance to change caused by disagreement with the evidence, negative beliefs about the usefulness or added value of the intervention, or belief that the intervention was not part of their role were commonly described as a barrier to implementation.
“Resistance to change caused by disagreement with the evidence, negative beliefs about the usefulness or added value of the intervention or belief that the intervention was not part of their role were commonly described as a barrier to implementation [3, 14, 35, 41, 67–70, 76, 77, 80].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Vedel, I., Puts, M. T. E., Monette, M., Monette, J., & Bergman, H.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Jewish General Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vedel, Isabelle
- Puts, Martine T.E.
- Monette, Michele
- Monette, Johanne
- Bergman, Howard
- Venue
- Journal of Geriatric Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-98
- ISSN
- 1879-4068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100501145
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geriatric Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- breast cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, older adults, barriers to screening, facilitators of screening, primary care physicians, patient embarrassment, health insurance coverage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
