Cited by 27COVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrailty in Older AdultsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Experiences of healthcare providers of older adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Krok-Schoen, Jessica L., Pisegna, Janell L., BrintzenhofeSzoc, Karlynn, MacKenzie, Amy R., Canin, Beverly, Plotkin, Elana, Boehmer, Leigh M., Shahrokni, Armin·2021·Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Abstract

Objectives Care for older adults with cancer became more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to examine healthcare providers' clinical barriers, patient questions, and overall experiences related to care delivery for these patients during the pandemic.Materials and methods Members of the Advocacy Committee of the Cancer and Aging Research Group along with the Association of Community Cancer Centers developed a 20-question survey for healthcare providers of older adults with cancer. Eligible participants were recruited by email sent through professional organizations' listservs, email blasts, and social media. This manuscript reports the qualitative data from the survey's three open-ended questions. Free text, open-ended survey items were analyzed by two independent coders for identification of common themes using NVivo software. Theme agreement was reached through consensus and count comparisons of participant responses were made.Results Healthcare system organizational challenges and meeting basic needs and support were commonly reported themes among respondents (n = 274). Barriers to care delivery included organizational challenges, patients' access to resources and support, concerns for patients' mental and physical health, and telehealth challenges. Respondents reported older adults were asking about their health and cancer care as well as access to basic needs and supports. Providers described worrying about patients' mental health, fear of personal safety, frustration in multi-level institutions, as well as experiencing positive leadership and communication.Conclusion Providers are faced with balancing their concerns for personal and patient safety. These findings demand resources and support allocation for older adults with cancer and healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.09.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adult cancer survivors have described barriers to cancer treatment across the pandemic, including restricted attendance of caregivers at appointments, diminished access to healthcare services, and feeling less connected to their healthcare team.

    “Older adult cancer survivors have described barriers to cancer treatment across the pandemic, including restricted attendance of caregivers at appointments, diminished access to healthcare services, and feeling less connected to their healthcare team [8,9].”

    From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results sections on clinical barriers and patient questions report restricted caregiver attendance, delayed care, and other access difficulties for older adults with cancer. But these accounts come from healthcare providers rather than a study of survivors describing their own experiences, and the passages do not establish that patients felt less connected to their healthcare team. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]BrintzenhofeSzoc K. Daratsos L. End-of-life care in caring for patients with mesothelioma: Principles and guidelines 2019 Springer Cham 163 175

Authors
Krok-Schoen, J. L., Pisegna, J. L., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., MacKenzie, A. R., Canin, B., Plotkin, E., Boehmer, L. M., & Shahrokni, A.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Association of Community Cancer Centers (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
190-195
ISSN
1879-4068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087394474
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • ACCC
  • CARG
  • Association of Oncology Social Work, and Social Work Hospice and Palliative Care Network (CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
elderly cancer patients, COVID-19 pandemic, health professionals' experiences, barriers to cancer care, patient mental health, patient safety concerns, leadership and communication, cancer care delivery
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review