Cited by 556Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalChromium effects and bioremediationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by raw and acid-treated green alga Oedogonium hatei from aqueous solutions

Gupta, V.K., Rastogi, A.·2009·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), biosorption by raw and acid-treated Oedogonium hatei were studied from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were conducted to determine the biosorption properties of the biomass. The optimum conditions of biosorption were found to be: a biomass dose of 0.8 g/L, contact time of 110 min, pH and temperature 2.0 and 318 K respectively. Both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm equations could fit the equilibrium data. Under the optimal conditions, the biosorption capacities of the raw and acid-treated algae were 31 and 35.2 mg Cr(VI) per g of dry adsorbent, respectively. Thermodynamic parameters showed that the adsorption of Cr(VI) onto algal biomass was feasible, spontaneous and endothermic under studied conditions. The pseudo-first-order kinetic model adequately describe the kinetic data in comparison to second-order model and the process involving rate-controlling step is much complex involving both boundary layer and intra-particle diffusion processes. The physical and chemical properties of the biosorbent were determined and the nature of biomass-metal ions interactions were evaluated by FTIR analysis, which showed the participation of -COOH, -OH and -NH(2) groups in the biosorption process. Biosorbents could be regenerated using 0.1 M NaOH solution, with up to 75% recovery. Thus, the biomass used in this work proved to be effective materials for the treatment of chromium bearing aqueous solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 556

Authors
Gupta, V. K., & Rastogi, A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Corresponding author
Gupta, V.K.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
396-402
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007470293
Cited by
556
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 116
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI) biosorption, green algae, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, biosorbent regeneration, heavy metal removal from water
MeSH terms
Acids, Chlorophyta, Chromium, Diffusion, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Solutions, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review