Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by raw and acid-treated green alga Oedogonium hatei from aqueous solutions
Abstract
The hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), biosorption by raw and acid-treated Oedogonium hatei were studied from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were conducted to determine the biosorption properties of the biomass. The optimum conditions of biosorption were found to be: a biomass dose of 0.8 g/L, contact time of 110 min, pH and temperature 2.0 and 318 K respectively. Both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm equations could fit the equilibrium data. Under the optimal conditions, the biosorption capacities of the raw and acid-treated algae were 31 and 35.2 mg Cr(VI) per g of dry adsorbent, respectively. Thermodynamic parameters showed that the adsorption of Cr(VI) onto algal biomass was feasible, spontaneous and endothermic under studied conditions. The pseudo-first-order kinetic model adequately describe the kinetic data in comparison to second-order model and the process involving rate-controlling step is much complex involving both boundary layer and intra-particle diffusion processes. The physical and chemical properties of the biosorbent were determined and the nature of biomass-metal ions interactions were evaluated by FTIR analysis, which showed the participation of -COOH, -OH and -NH(2) groups in the biosorption process. Biosorbents could be regenerated using 0.1 M NaOH solution, with up to 75% recovery. Thus, the biomass used in this work proved to be effective materials for the treatment of chromium bearing aqueous solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For RHB, the closest qe value to the kinetic experiment was found for the pseudo-second order model compared to the pseudo-first order model.
“Moreover, closest q e value to kinetic experiment was also found for pseudo-second order model as compared to q e value of pseudo-first order [58].”
From Adsorption-reduction performance of tea waste and rice husk biochars for Cr(VI) elimination from wastewater (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 556
- Authors
- Gupta, V. K., & Rastogi, A.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, V.K.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 396-402
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007470293
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 22.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI) biosorption, green algae, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, biosorbent regeneration, heavy metal removal from water
- MeSH terms
- Acids, Chlorophyta, Chromium, Diffusion, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Solutions, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review