Cited by 217CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Mineral carbonation for carbon sequestration in cement kiln dust from waste piles

Huntzinger, Deborah N., Gierke, John S., Sutter, Lawrence L., Kawatra, S. Komar, Eisele, Timothy C.·2009·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Alkaline earth metals, such as calcium and magnesium oxides, readily react with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) to produce stable carbonate minerals. Carbon sequestration through the formation of carbonate minerals is a potential means to reduce CO(2) emissions. Calcium-rich, industrial solid wastes and residues provide a potential source of highly reactive oxides, without the need for pre-processing. This paper presents the first study examining the feasibility of carbon sequestration in cement kiln dust (CKD), a byproduct generated during the manufacturing of cement. A series of column experiments were conducted on segments of intact core taken from landfilled CKD. Based on stoichiometry and measured consumption of CO(2) during the experiments, degrees of carbonation greater than 70% of the material's potential theoretical extent were achieved under ambient temperature and pressure conditions. The overall extent of carbonation/sequestration was greater in columns with lower water contents. The major sequestration product appears to be calcite; however, more detailed material characterization is need on pre- and post-carbonated samples to better elucidate carbonation pathways and products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.122

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huntzinger, D. N., Gierke, J. S., Sutter, L. L., Kawatra, S. K., & Eisele, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
Corresponding author
Huntzinger, Deborah N.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08-30
Volume
168
Issue
1
Pages
31-37
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128180942
Cited by
217
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Iowa State University
  • National Energy Technology Laboratory
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, carbon sequestration, cement kiln dust, CO2 emission reduction, calcite formation, alkaline earth oxides, industrial waste landfill, column experiments, water content effects, carbonation degree
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Construction Materials, Industrial Waste, Manufactured Materials, Minerals, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review