The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oxidative degradations of reactive blue 4 dye by different advanced oxidation methods
Abstract
The degradations of an anthraquinone dye, the reactive blue 4 (RB4), were studied by wet air oxidation (WAO), wet peroxide oxidation (WPO), photocatalytic oxidation, and electro-Fenton (EF) advanced oxidation. The RB4 oxidation was evaluated by the decrease in total organic carbon (TOC) content and concentration. The most efficient method for mineralization of RB4 was WPO, but in all methods TOC removal efficiency was above 75% after 60 min of treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research examples either did not identify further degradation past the original rupture from the dye structure, or identified big fragments and even polymerized by-products.
“Research examples either did not identify further degradation past the original rupture from the dye structure 93, 95, 214 , or identified big fragments and even polymerized by-products 97 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [93]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Gözmen, B., Kayan, B., Gizir, A. M., & Hesenov, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08-30
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-136
- ISSN
- 0304-3894
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
