Cited by 207Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchCoal and Its By-products

Investigation of accelerated and natural carbonation of MSWI fly ash with a high content of Ca

Wang, Lei, Jin, Yiying, Nie, Yongfeng·2010·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The application of accelerated carbonation and natural carbonation to treat municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash was presented. The influence of reaction time and the liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratio, which both affect the reactivity of CO(2), was evaluated to determine their impact on the quality of carbonation. The optimum carbonation reaction of fly ash was found to occur when an L/S of 0.25 was used. Carbonation decreased the leaching of Pb, Cu, Zn and As, but increased the leaching of Cd and Sb. Based on the leaching of these six heavy metals, the optimum pH of the carbonated fly ash was 9.5-10.5. The release of soluble salts such as SO(4), Cl and F changed little following carbonation, and their release occurred independently of pH. The release potential and leaching behavior of carbonated fly ash were further evaluated using the three-step sequential extraction procedure proposed by the commission of the European Communities Bureau of Reference (BCR). The results of the BCR analyses revealed that carbonation exerted a significant effect on the heavy metal fractions in steps 1 and 2, but little effect on the distribution of heavy metals in step 3 and residue fraction. Physical and chemical changes induced by carbonation were presented and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.055

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Jin, Y., & Nie, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shenyang Aerospace University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Lei
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
174
Issue
1-3
Pages
334-343
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079276040
Cited by
207
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, carbonation, heavy metal leaching, liquid-to-solid ratio, reaction time (chemistry), pH effect, BCR sequential extraction, heavy metal fractionation, lead, cadmium, antimony, arsenic, zinc, copper
MeSH terms
Calcium, Carbon, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Particulate Matter, Coal Ash

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review