Performance evaluation for carbonation of steel-making slags in a slurry reactor
Abstract
CO(2) sequestration by the aqueous carbonation of steel-making slag under various operational conditions was investigated in this study. The effects of the operational conditions, including type of steel-making slag, reaction time, reaction temperature, and CO(2) flow rate, on the performance of the carbonation process were evaluated. The results indicated that the BOF slag had the highest carbonation conversion, approximately 72%, at a reaction time of 1h, an operating pressure of 101 kPa and a temperature of 60°C due to its higher BET surface area of BOF slag compared to UF, FA, and BHC slags. The major factors affecting the carbonation conversion are reaction time and temperature. The reaction kinetics of the carbonation conversion can be expressed by the shrinking-core model. The measurements of the carbonated material by the SEM and XRD instruments provide evidence indicating the suitability of using the shrinking-core model in this investigation. Comparison of the results with other studies suggests that aqueous carbonation by slurry reactor is viable due to its higher mass transfer rate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In aqueous carbonation experiments of slag at temperatures between 30 and 80°C, measured CO2 sequestration capacity peaked at approximately 60°C.
“A similar phenomenon was also obtained in [133] in which the aqueous carbonation experiments of slag were performed at temperatures ranging between 30 and 80 • C. The measured CO 2 sequestration capacity of slag peaked at approximately 60 • C.”
From An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry (2022) · cites this paper as [133]
To achieve maximum potential of CO2 sequestration of slag, temperature control in carbonation treatment is crucial.
“To achieve the maximum potential of CO 2 sequestration of slag, temperature control in carbonation treatment is crucial [46,114,133], as highlighted in Sections 3.1 and 3.2.”
From An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry (2022) · cites this paper as [133]
Slight decrease in CO2 sequestration capacity after 50 or 60°C can be attributed to rapid growth of calcite layers on surface of slag particles.
“The slight decrease in the CO 2 sequestration capacity after 50 or 60 • C in [46,133] can be attributed to the rapid growth of the calcite layers on the surface of slag particles, as discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2.”
From An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry (2022) · cites this paper as [133]
Sulfamic acid volatilizes and/or decomposes at a significant rate by 400°C, which will affect the recovery of Mg.
“However, sulfamic acid volatilizes and/or decomposes at a significant rate by 400 1C, which will affect the recovery of Mg. 121,122”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [121]
Modest recovery of magnesium (50-60%) is currently limiting the two-step ammonium salt technology.
“Moreover, modest recovery of magnesium (50-60%) is currently limiting this technology.121”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [121]
Cites
A Guide to CO <sub>2</sub> Sequestration
Lackner, K. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079033 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Mineral CO <sub>2</sub> Sequestration by Steel Slag Carbonation
Huijgen, W. J. J., Witkamp, G.-J., & Comans, R. N. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050795f · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide sequestration in cement kiln dust through mineral carbonation
Huntzinger, D. N., Gierke, J. S., Kawatra, S. K., Eisele, T. C., & Sutter, L. L. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802910z · Cited by 442 · see citing works
An apparent kinetic model for the carbonation of calcium oxide by carbon dioxide
Lee, D. K. (2004) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2003.12.003 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub>
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
Pan, S.-Y., Chang, E. E., & Chiang, P.-C. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.06.0149 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry
Li, L., & Wu, M. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102000 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Mineralization of carbon dioxide: A literature review
Romanov, V., Soong, Y., Carney, C., Rush, G. E., Nielsen, B., & O'Connor, W. (2015) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.201500002 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Santos, R. M., Van Bouwel, J., Vandevelde, E., Mertens, G., Elsen, J., & Van Gerven, T. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.004 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Salman, M., Cizer, Ö., Pontikes, Y., Santos, R. M., Snellings, R., Vandewalle, L., Blanpain, B., & Van Balen, K. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.051 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Thin-film versus slurry-phase carbonation of steel slag: CO2 uptake and effects on mineralogy
Baciocchi, R., Costa, G., Di Gianfilippo, M., Polettini, A., Pomi, R., & Stramazzo, A. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.016 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Gadikota, G., Matter, J., Kelemen, P., Brady, P. V., & Park, A.-H. A. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117900 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Tian, S., Jiang, J., Chen, X., Yan, F., & Li, K. (2013) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201300436 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Atmospheric CO2 Sequestration in Iron and Steel Slag: Consett, County Durham, United Kingdom
Mayes, W. M., Riley, A. L., Gomes, H. I., Brabham, P., Hamlyn, J., Pullin, H., & Renforth, P. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01883 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Luo, Y., & He, D. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15254-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Kumar, P., Patel, A. K., Singhania, R. R., Chen, C.-W., Saratale, R. G., & Dong, C.-D. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129654 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationKirchofer, A., Becker, A., Brandt, A., & Wilcox, J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4003982 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Hosseini, T., Selomulya, C., Haque, N., & Zhang, L. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01609 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chang, E.-E., Chen, C.-H., Chen, Y.-H., Pan, S.-Y., & Chiang, P.-C.
- Affiliations
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- National Taipei University of Technology (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chiang, Pen-Chi
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 558-564
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053562890
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Keywords
- steel slag, aqueous carbonation, CO2 sequestration, slurry reactor, basic oxygen furnace slag, carbonation conversion, shrinking core model, carbonation kinetics, reaction temperature, reaction time (chemistry), CO2 flow rate, mass transfer
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Kinetics, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Steel, Thermogravimetry, X-Ray Diffraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review