The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly efficient extraction of phenolic compounds by use of magnetic room temperature ionic liquids for environmental remediation
Open accessAbstract
A hydrophobic magnetic room temperature ionic liquid (MRTIL), trihexyltetradecylphosphonium tetrachloroferrate(III) ([3C6PC14][FeCl4]), was synthesized from trihexyltetradecylphosphonium chloride and FeCl3·6H2O. This MRTIL was investigated as a possible separation agent for solvent extraction of phenolic compounds from aqueous solution. Due to its strong paramagnetism, [3C6PC14][FeCl4] responds to an external neodymium magnet, which was employed in the design of a novel magnetic extraction technique. The conditions for extraction, including extraction time, volume ratio between MRTIL and aqueous phase, pH of aqueous solution, and structures of phenolic compounds were investigated and optimized. The magnetic extraction of phenols achieved equilibrium in 20 min and the phenolic compounds were found to have higher distribution ratios under acidic conditions. In addition, it was observed that phenols containing a greater number of chlorine or nitro substitutents exhibited higher distribution ratios. For example, the distribution ratio of phenol (DPh) was 107. In contrast, 3,5-dichlorophenol distribution ratio (D3,5-DCP) had a much higher value of 6372 under identical extraction conditions. When compared with four selected traditional non-magnetic room temperature ionic liquids, our [3C6PC14][FeCl4] exhibited significantly higher extraction efficiency under the same experimental conditions used in this work. Pentachlorophenol, a major component in the contaminated soil sample obtained from a superfund site, was successfully extracted and removed by use of [3C6PC14][FeCl4] with high extraction efficiency. Pentachlorophenol concentration was dramatically reduced from 7.8 μg.mL−1 to 0.2 μg.mL−1 after the magnetic extraction by use of [3C6PC14][FeCl4].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A ionic liquid for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of phenols
Fan, Y. C., Chen, M. L., Shen-Tu, C., & Zhu, Y. (2009) · Journal of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1134/s1061934809100074 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Rykowska, I., Ziemblińska, J., & Nowak, I. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.043 · Cited by 353
Magnetic ionic liquids in analytical chemistry: A review
Clark, K. D., Nacham, O., Purslow, J. A., Pierson, S. A., & Anderson, J. L. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.06.011 · Cited by 222
Khezeli, T., & Daneshfar, A. (2017) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.08.023 · Cited by 137
Non-conventional solvents in liquid phase microextraction and aqueous biphasic systems
An, J., Trujillo-Rodríguez, M. J., Pino, V., & Anderson, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2017.04.012 · Cited by 128
Yao, T., Li, H., Ren, Y., Feng, M., Hu, Y., Yan, H., & Peng, L. (2022) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120034 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, N., Li, M., Zhao, L., Lu, C., de Rooy, S. L., & Warner, I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1350-1357
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166115697
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly efficient extraction of phenolic compounds by use of magnetic room temperature ionic liquids for environmental remediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.053
- The paper
- Deng, N., Li, M., Zhao, L., Lu, C., de Rooy, S. L., & Warner, I. M. (2011). Highly efficient extraction of phenolic compounds by use of magnetic room temperature ionic liquids for environmental remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.