CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 132Environmental remediation with nanomaterialsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Removal of cadmium, copper, nickel, cobalt and mercury from water by Apatite II™: Column experiments

Open access
Oliva, Josep, De Pablo, Joan, Cortina, José-Luis, Cama, Jordi, Ayora, Carlos·2011·Journal of Hazardous Materials
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.104
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Apatite II™, a biogenic hydroxyapatite, was evaluated as a reactive material for heavy metal (Cd, Cu, Co, Ni and Hg) removal in passive treatments. Apatite II™ reacts with acid water by releasing phosphates that increase the pH up to 6.5-7.5, complexing and inducing metals to precipitate as metal phosphates. The evolution of the solution concentration of calcium, phosphate and metals together with SEM-EDS and XRD examinations were used to identify the retention mechanisms. SEM observation shows low-crystalline precipitate layers composed of P, O and M. Only in the case of Hg and Co were small amounts of crystalline phases detected. Solubility data values were used to predict the measured column experiment values and to support the removal process based on the dissolution of hydroxyapatite, the formation of metal-phosphate species in solution and the precipitation of metal phosphate. Cd(5)(PO(4))(3)OH(s), Cu(2)(PO(4))OH(s), Ni(3)(PO(4))(2)(s), Co(3)(PO(4))(2)8H(2)O(s) and Hg(3)(PO(4))(2)(s) are proposed as the possible mineral phases responsible for the removal processes. The results of the column experiments show that Apatite II™ is a suitable filling for permeable reactive barriers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phosphates released by Pb-bearing minerals (e.g., apatite) cause an increase of the pH up to 6.5-7.5, which induce the complexation and precipitation of heavy metals such as Cd, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn as metal phosphates.

    “For instance, phosphates released by Pbearing minerals (e.g., apatite) cause an increase of the pH up to 6.5 -7.5, which induce the complexation and precipitation of heavy metals such as Cd, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn, as metal phosphates [36, 37].”

    From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [37]

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 132

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Johnson, 2005, Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review, Sci. Total Environ., 338, 3, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 · DOI
  2. Akcil, 2006, Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies, J. Clean. Prod., 14, 1139, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006 · DOI
  3. Thiruvenkatachari, 2008, Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14, 146, 10.1016/j.jiec.2007.10.001 · DOI
  4. Blowes, 1997, In-situ remediation of Cr(IV)-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive walls: laboratory studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 3348, 10.1021/es960844b · DOI
  5. Gibert, 2005, Municipal compost-based mixture for acid mine drainage bioremediation: metal retention mechanisms, Appl. Geochem., 20, 1648, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.04.012 · DOI
  6. Rötting, 2008, Field application of calcite Dispersed Alkaline Substrate (calcite-DAS) for passive treatment of acid mine drainage with high Al and metal concentrations, Appl. Geochem., 23, 1660, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.02.023 · DOI
  7. Rötting, 2006, Use of caustic magnesia to remove cadmium, nickel and cobalt from water in passive treatment systems: column experiments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6438, 10.1021/es061092g · DOI
  8. Conca, 2006, An Apatite II™ permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater containing Zn, Pb and Cd, Appl. Geochem., 21, 2188, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.08.018 · DOI
  9. Ma, 1995, Lead immobilization from aqueous solutions and contaminated soils using phosphate rocks, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 1118, 10.1021/es00004a034 · DOI
  10. Chen, 1997, Evaluation of heavy metal remediation using mineral apatite, Water Air Soil Pollut., 98, 57, 10.1007/BF02128650 · DOI
  11. Cao, 2004, Mechanisms of lead, copper and zinc retention by phosphate rock, Environ. Pollut., 131, 435, 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.003 · DOI
  12. Dybowska, 2009, An evaluation of the reactivity of synthetic and natural apatites in the presence of aqueous metals, Sci. Total Environ., 407, 2953, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.053 · DOI
  13. Suzuki, 1981, Synthetic hydroxyapatites employed as inorganic cation-exchangers, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I, 77, 1059, 10.1039/f19817701059 · DOI
  14. Liu, 2007, In situ immobilization of Cu(II) in soils using a new class of iron phosphate nanoparticles, Chemosphere, 68, 1867, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.010 · DOI
  15. Corami, 2008, Cadmium removal from single- and multi-metal (Cd+Pb+Zn+Cu) solutions by sorption on hydroxyapatite, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 317, 402, 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.075 · DOI
  16. Corami, 2008, Removal of Cu from aqueous solutions by synthetic hydroxyapatite: EXAFS investigation, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 149, 209, 10.1016/j.mseb.2007.11.006 · DOI
  17. Admassu, 1999, Feasibility of using natural fishbone apatite as a substitute for hydroxyapatite in remediating aqueous heavy metals, J. Hazard. Mater., B69, 187, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00102-8 · DOI
  18. J. Wright, K.R. Rice, B. Murphy, J.L. Conca, PIMS-remediation of Pb- contaminated soil at Camp Stanley, Texas, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Sustainable Range Management. ISBN: 1-57477-144-2, B4-04.
  19. Raicevic, 2006, Theoretical stability assessment of uranyl phosphates and apatites: selection of amendments for in situ remediation of uranium, Sci. Total Environ., 355, 13, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.006 · DOI
  20. Corami, 2007, Copper and zinc decontamination from single- and binary-metal solutions using hydroxyapatite, J. Hazard. Mater., 146, 164, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.003 · DOI
  21. Sljivic, 2009, The influence of equilibration conditions and hydroxyapatite physico-chemical properties onto retention of Cu2+ ions, Chem. Eng. J., 148, 80, 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.003 · DOI
  22. Elouear, 2008, Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions by activated phosphate rock, J. Hazard. Mater., 156, 412, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.036 · DOI
  23. Smiciklas, 2008, Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite, J. Hazard. Mater., 152, 876, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.056 · DOI
  24. Sugiyama, 2003, Heavy metal immobilization in aqueous solution using calcium phosphate and calcium hydrogen phosphates, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 259, 408, 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00211-4 · DOI
  25. Valsami-Jones, 1998, The dissolution of apatite in the presence of aqueous metal cations at pH 2–7, Chem. Geol., 151, 215, 10.1016/S0009-2541(98)00081-3 · DOI
  26. Oliva, 2010, The use of Apatite II™ to remove divalent metal ions zinc(II); lead(II); manganese(II) and iron(II) from water in passive treatment systems: column experiments, J. Hazard. Mater., 184, 364, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.045 · DOI
  27. Raicevic, 2005, In situ stabilization of toxic metals in polluted soils using phosphates: theoretical prediction and experimental verification, J. Hazard. Mater., B117, 41, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.07.024 · DOI
  28. Middelburg, 1991, Sorption of cadmium on hydroxyapatite, Chem. Geol., 90, 45, 10.1016/0009-2541(91)90032-M · DOI
  29. Yasukawa, 2007, Reaction of calcium hydroxyapatite with Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 299, 203, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.042 · DOI
  30. Jeanjean, 1996, A crystallographic study of the sorption of cadmium on calcium hydroxyapatites: incidence of cationic vacances, J. Solid State Chem., 126, 195, 10.1006/jssc.1996.0329 · DOI
  31. Mandjiny, 1998, Calcium hydroxyapatites: evaluation of sorption properties for cadmium ions in aqueous solution, J. Mater. Sci., 33, 5433, 10.1023/A:1004462703824 · DOI
  32. Ma, 1994, Effects of aqueous Al, Cd, Cu, Fe(II), Ni, and Zn on Pb immobilization by hydroxyapatite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1219, 10.1021/es00056a007 · DOI
  33. Cheung, 2001, Combined diffusion model for the sorption of cadmium, copper, and zinc ions onto bone char, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1511, 10.1021/es0012725 · DOI
  34. Zheng, 2008, Adsorption removal of cadmium and copper from aqueous solution by areca—a food waste, J. Hazard. Mater., 157, 490, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.029 · DOI
  35. Ko, 2001, Determination of solid-phase loading for the removal of metal ion from effluents using fixed-bed adsorbers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2797, 10.1021/es001648e · DOI
  36. Mavropoulos, 2005, Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ ions uptake by Brazilian phosphate rocks, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 16, 62, 10.1590/S0103-50532005000100010 · DOI
  37. Perrone, 2001, Sorption of nickel on carbonate fluoroapatites, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 239, 303, 10.1006/jcis.2001.7583 · DOI
  38. Elouear, 2009, Use of phosphate rock for the removal of Ni2+ from aqueous solutions: kinetic and thermodynamics studies, J. Environ. Eng. ASCE, 135, 259, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:4(259) · DOI
  39. Mobasherpour, 2011, Removal of nickel (II) from aqueous solutions by using nano-crystalline calcium hydroxyapatite, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 15, 105, 10.1016/j.jscs.2010.06.003 · DOI
  40. Gómez del Río, 2004, Natural materials for remediation of industrial effluents: comparative study of the retention of Cd, Zn and Co by calcite e HAP. Part I. Batch experiments, J. Environ. Manage., 71, 169, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.004 · DOI
  41. Dimovic, 2009, Comparative study of differently treated animal bones for Co2+ removal, J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 279, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.013 · DOI
  42. Pan, 2009, Sorption of cobalt to bone char: kinetics, competitive sorption and mechanism, Desalination, 249, 609, 10.1016/j.desal.2009.01.027 · DOI
  43. Smiciklas, 2006, Removal of Co2+ from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite, Water Res., 40, 2267, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.031 · DOI
  44. Narasaraju, 1996, Some physico-chemical aspects of hydroxyapatite, J. Mater. Sci., 31, 1, 10.1007/BF00355120 · DOI
  45. Peld, 2004, Sorption and desorption of Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions in apatite-aqueous systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5626, 10.1021/es049831l · DOI
  46. Smiciklas, 2000, The point of zero charge and sorption of cadmium(II) and strontium(II) ions on synthetic hydroxyapatite, Sep. Purif. Technol., 18, 185, 10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00066-0 · DOI
  47. Smiciklas, 2005, Experimental design approach in the synthesis of hydroxyapatite by neutralization method, Sep. Purif. Technol., 44, 97, 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.12.010 · DOI
  48. Xu, 1994, Sorption of Zn2+ and Cd2+ on hydroxyapatite surfaces, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1472, 10.1021/es00057a015 · DOI
  49. Zhu, 2008, Removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite, Catal. Today, 128, 94, 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.011 · DOI
  50. Zhang, 2010, Immobilization of lead and cadmium from aqueous solution and contaminated sediment using nano-hydroxyapatite, Environ. Pollut., 158, 514, 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.024 · DOI
  51. Sneddon, 2006, Use of bone meal amendments to immobilise Pb, Zn and Cd in soil: a leaching column study, Environ. Pollut., 144, 816, 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.008 · DOI
  52. Wang, 2009, Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on Cu(II) adsorption onto hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater., 162, 1135, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Oliva, J., De Pablo, J., Cortina, J.-L., Cama, J., & Ayora, C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
  • Centro Tecnológico del Agua (ES)
  • Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (ES)
Corresponding author
Cortina, José-Luis
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
194
Pages
312-323
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.104
OpenAlex
W2014941490
Cited by
132
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
biogenic hydroxyapatite, heavy metal removal, cadmium, copper, nickel, cobalt, mercury, metal phosphates, passive treatment, permeable reactive barrier, column experiments, acid mine drainage, phosphate release
MeSH terms
Apatites, Cadmium, Cobalt, Copper, Mercury, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nickel, X-Ray Diffraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review