Cited by 61Arsenic contamination and mitigationLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and ApplicationsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Effect of inorganic and organic ligands on the sorption/desorption of arsenate on/from Al–Mg and Fe–Mg layered double hydroxides

Caporale, A.G., Pigna, M., Dynes, J.J., Cozzolino, V., Zhu, J., Violante, A.·2011·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

This paper describes the sorption of arsenate on Al-Mg and Fe-Mg layered double hydroxides as affected by pH and varying concentrations of inorganic and organic ligands, and the effect of residence time on the desorption of arsenate by ligands. The capacity of ligands to inhibit the fixation of arsenate followed the sequence: nitrate<nitrite<sulphate<selenite<tartrate<oxalate≪phosphate on Al-Mg-LDH and nitrate<sulphate≈nitrite<tartrate<oxalate<selenite≪ phosphate on Fe-Mg-LDH. The inhibition of arsenate sorption increased by increasing the initial ligand concentration and was greater on Al-Mg-LDH than on Fe-Mg-LDH. The longer the arsenate residence time on the LDH surfaces the less effective the competing ligands were in desorbing arsenate from sorbents. A greater percentage of arsenate was removed by phosphate from Al-Mg-LDH than from Fe-Mg-LDH, due to the higher affinity of arsenate for iron than aluminum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fe-Mg-LDH sorbent was able to hold a much higher amount of arsenate than arsenite, and the sorption of arsenate was much more pH-dependent than that of arsenite.

    “They also observed that Fe-Mg-LDH sorbent was able to hold a much higher amount of arsenate than arsenite and noted that the sorption of the former was much more pHdependent than the latter.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caporale, A. G., Pigna, M., Dynes, J. J., Cozzolino, V., Zhu, J., & Violante, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Violante, A.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
198
Pages
291-298
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035138485
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
arsenate adsorption, layered double hydroxides, phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, selenite, tartrate, oxalate, residence time, pH effect, arsenic removal
MeSH terms
Arsenates, Hydroxides, Inorganic Chemicals, Ligands, Metals, Organic Chemicals, X-Ray Diffraction, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review