Cited by 258CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Accelerated carbonation of steelmaking slags in a high-gravity rotating packed bed

Chang, E-E, Pan, Shu-Yuan, Chen, Yi-Hung, Tan, Chung-Sung, Chiang, Pen-Chi·2012·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) sequestration using the accelerated carbonation of basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag in a high-gravity rotating packed bed (RPB) under various operational conditions was investigated. The effects of reaction time, reaction temperature, rotation speed and slurry flow rate on the CO(2) sequestration process were evaluated. The samples of reacted slurry were analyzed quantitatively using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and qualitatively using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The sequestration experiments were performed at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 20:1 with a flow rate of 2.5 L min(-1) of a pure CO(2) stream under atmospheric temperature and pressure. The results show that a maximum conversion of BOF slag was 93.5% at a reaction time of 30 min and a rotation speed of 750 rpm at 65°C. The experimental data were utilized to determine the rate-limiting mechanism based on the shrinking core model (SCM), which was validated by the observations of SEM and TEM. Accelerated carbonation in a RPB was confirmed to be a viable method due to its higher mass-transfer rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.021

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, E.-E., Pan, S.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., Tan, C.-S., & Chiang, P.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • National Taipei University of Technology (TW)
  • National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chiang, Pen-Chi
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
227-228
Pages
97-106
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066614287
Cited by
258
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • China Steel Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
accelerated carbonation, basic oxygen furnace slag, CO2 sequestration, CO2 capture, shrinking core model, mass transfer, rate-limiting processes, rotational speed, reaction temperature
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Carbonates, Industrial Waste, Steel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review