Cited by 42Heavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Mono-and co-applications of Ca-bentonite with zeolite, Ca-hydroxide, and tobacco biochar affect phytoavailability and uptake of copper and lead in a gold mine-polluted soil

Lahori, Altaf Hussain, Zhang, Zengqiang, Shaheen, Sabry M., Rinklebe, Jörg, Guo, Zhanyu, Li, Ronghua, Mahar, Amanullah, Wang, Zhen +4 more·2019·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

We assessed the efficacy of Ca-bentonite (CB) alone and combined with Ca-hydroxide (CH), tobacco biochar (TB), and zeolite (ZL) aiming to immobilize Cu and Pb and decrease their bioavailability and uptake by pak choi followed by maize in a mining contaminated soil. The CB alone was able to decrease the availability and uptake of Cu and Pb by pak choi and maize. The mono- and multi-combination of CH, TB, and ZL with CB showed contradictory impact on the availability and uptake of Cu and Pb as compared to the mono-application of CB. The combination of CB with ZL and CH + ZL reduced the uptake of Pb by pak choi and maize, while the combination of CB with TB and ZL reduced the uptake of Cu by pak choi and maize as compared to the mono-application of CB. The co-application of CB with CH increased the phytoextraction of Cu by maize and Pb by pak choi shoots as compared to the mono-application of CB. We conclude that modified clays such as CB alone or combined with ZL, TB, and/or CH might be suitable candidates for phytomanagement of Cu and Pb contaminated soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 42

Authors
Lahori, A. H., Zhang, Z., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., Guo, Z., Li, R., Mahar, A., Wang, Z., Ren, C., Mi, S., Liu, T., & Jing, R.
Affiliations
  • Northwest A&F University (CN)
  • Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • University of Sindh (PK)
  • Ningxia University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Zengqiang
  • Shaheen, Sabry M.
  • Rinklebe, Jörg
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
374
Pages
401-411
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2938929540
Cited by
42
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
calcium bentonite, zeolites, calcium hydroxide, copper, lead, heavy metal immobilization, phytoavailability, heavy metal uptake, phytoremediation, mining-contaminated soil, Brassica chinensis, maize
MeSH terms
Bentonite, Calcium, Calcium Hydroxide, Charcoal, China, Chlorophyll, Copper, Zea mays, Gold, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lead, Mining, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Nicotiana, Zeolites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review