Release of hazardous nanoplastic contaminants due to microplastics fragmentation under shear stress forces
Open accessAbstract
The presence of nanoplastics in water has become a major environmental concern in the last decade however the knowledge on the origin and formation of these emerging contaminants is lacking due to analytical challenges in detection and quantification techniques. The release of nanoplastics due to the fragmentation of microplastics extracted from a facial scrub and the resulting toxicity on aquatic species are reported here for the first time. The daily use of 4 g of facial scrub could release up to 10 11 microplastics of 400 nm in size per litre of wastewater from household drains. Turbulences created by mixing or pumping induced the fragmentation of microplastics into nanoplastics smaller than 10 nm via a crack propagation and failure mechanism, increasing the number of particles in water by one order of magnitude. Compared to microplastics at a fixed concentration number of 6.8 × 10 8 part./mL, the generated nanoplastics initiated the death of 54% more cells in zebrafish by passive ingestion via skin diffusion which therefore pose a real threat for aquatic living organisms. These results stress the need to reduce the release of nano/microplastics in the aquatic environment to prevent the contamination of all trophic levels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PMD fragmentation leads to the formation of particle sizes <1 mm, i.e. nanoplastics.
“PMD fragmentation also leads to the formation of particle sizes <1 mm, i.e. nanoplastics.This has been documented as a result of shear forces in the digestive tracts of krill and perhaps other crustaceans, 96 due to abrasion in a mill 106 or blender, 94 and even as a result of turbulence 95”
From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 410
- Authors
- Enfrin, M., Lee, J., Gibert, Y., Basheer, F., Kong, L., & Dumée, L. F.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Judy
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 384
- Pages
- 121393
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982353953
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 33
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- nanoplastics, microplastic fragmentation, shear stress, domestic wastewater, crack propagation, zebrafish toxicity, skin diffusion, aquatic organisms, microplastic release
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review