Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing heavy metal availability and risk assessment of soils at typical metal mines in Eastern China

Zhong, Xi, Chen, Ziwu, Li, Yaying, Ding, Kengbo, Liu, Wenshen, Liu, Ye, Yuan, Yongqiang, Zhang, Miaoyue, Baker, Alan J M, Yang, Wenjun, Fei, Yingheng, Wang, Yujie, Chao, Yuanqing, Qiu, Rongliang·2020·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

China exemplifies the serious and widespread soil heavy metal pollution generated by mining activities. A total of 420 soil samples from 58 metal mines was collected across Eastern China. Total and available heavy metal concentrations, soil physico-chemical properties and geological indices were determined and collected. Risk assessments were applied, and a successive multivariate statistical analysis was carried out to provide insights into the heavy metal contamination characteristics and environmental drivers of heavy metal availability. The results suggested that although the degrees of pollution varied between different mine types, in general they had similar contamination characteristics in different regions. The major pollutants for total concentrations were found to be Cd and As in south and northeast China. The availability of Zn and Cd is relatively higher in south China. Soil physico-chemical properties had major effect on metal availability where soil pH was the most important factor. On a continental scale, soil pH and EC were influenced by the local climate patterns which could further impact on heavy metal availability. Enlightened by this study, future remediation strategies should be focused on steadily increasing soil pH, and building adaptable and sustainable ecological system to maintain low metal availabilities in mine site soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123289

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Metadata

Authors
Zhong, X., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Ding, K., Liu, W., Liu, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, M., Baker, A. J. M., Yang, W., Fei, Y., Wang, Y., Chao, Y., & Qiu, R.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
400
Pages
123289
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036685965
Cited by
365
References
89
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing heavy metal availability and risk assessment of soils at typical metal mines in Eastern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123289
The paper
Zhong, X., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Ding, K., Liu, W., Liu, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, M., Baker, A. J. M., Yang, W., Fei, Y., Wang, Y., Chao, Y., & Qiu, R. (2020). Factors influencing heavy metal availability and risk assessment of soils at typical metal mines in Eastern China. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123289

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.