Cited by 132Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Biochar-based bioretention systems for removal of chemical and microbial pollutants from stormwater: A critical review

Biswal, Basanta Kumar, Vijayaraghavan, Kuppusamy, Tsen-Tieng, Daryl Lee, Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar·2022·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Biochar has been increasingly used as a filter medium in engineered low impact development systems (e.g., bioretention systems) for decontamination of urban stormwater and management of hydrology. This review paper critically analyzes the performance of biochar-based biofiltration systems for removal of chemical and microbial pollutants present in urban runoff. Biochar-amended biofiltration systems efficiently remove diverse pollutants such as total nitrogen (32 - 61%), total phosphorus: (45 - 94%), heavy metals (27 - 100%), organics (54 - 100%) and microbial pollutants (log 10 removal: 0.78 - 4.23) from urban runoff. The variation of biofiltration performance is due to changes in biochar characteristics, the abundance of dissolved organic matter and/or stormwater chemistry. The dominant mechanisms responsible for removal of chemical pollutants are sorption, ion exchange and/or biotransformation, whereas filtration/straining is the major mechanism for bacteria removal. The pseudo-second order and Langmuir isotherm are the best models that describe the kinetics and chemical equilibrium of pollutants, respectively. This critical review provides the fundamental scientific knowledge for designing highly efficient biochar-based bioretention systems for removal of diverse pollutants from urban stormwater. The key knowledge gaps that should be addressed in future research include long-term field-scale bioretention study, development of novel methods for filter media regeneration/reu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126886

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 147 · Cited by 132

Authors
Biswal, B. K., Vijayaraghavan, K., Tsen-Tieng, D. L., & Balasubramanian, R.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National Parks Board (SG)
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
422
Pages
126886
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192406263
Cited by
132
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation Singapore
  • Ministry of National Development - Singapore (COT-V4-2019-6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
biochar, bioretention systems, biofiltration, urban stormwater, low impact development, nitrogen removal, phosphorus removal, heavy metal removal, organic pollutant removal, bacterial removal, sorption, ion exchange, biotransformation, dissolved organic matter, isotherm models, filter media regeneration
MeSH terms
Dissolved Organic Matter, Charcoal, Environmental Pollutants, Rain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review