Cited by 99Microplastics and Plastic PollutionAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paving roads with recycled plastics: Microplastic pollution or eco-friendly solution?

Enfrin, Marie, Myszka, Rebecca, Giustozzi, Filippo·2022·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Although plastic-modified roads are a promising approach to reducing the amount of landfilled and incinerated plastic and improving asphalt pavement performance, the contribution of plastic-modified roads to microplastic pollution is unknown. This study aimed to develop a new abrasion procedure to quantify the release of microplastics from recycled plastic-modified asphalt depending on environmental factors, the type and content of plastic used, and the incorporation method in bitumen/asphalt. A Wet Track Abrasion machine was used to simulate road traffic abrasion on a plastic-modified asphalt sample, and a novel microplastic extraction procedure was designed to extract the generated microplastics. Incorporating recycled plastic as a polymer modifier in the bitumen matrix resulted in an early release of microplastics compared to its addition as a synthetic aggregate substitute in the asphalt mix. Cold temperatures and low pH values favoured the generation of microplastics from plastic-modified asphalt. Due to the lack of universal thresholds for the release of microplastics into the environment, environmental agencies and local authorities could benefit from this novel laboratory-based microplastic assessment procedure to foster the sustainable use of recycled plastic in roads.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129334

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hall, F., White, G., 2021. Using local waste plastics in asphalt modification to improve engineering properties of roads. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management. Annapolis, Maryland, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 99

Metadata

Authors
Enfrin, M., Myszka, R., & Giustozzi, F.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Enfrin, Marie
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
437
Pages
129334
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281943516
Cited by
87
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
plastic-modified asphalt, recycled plastics, microplastic pollution, microplastic release, abrasion testing, microplastic extraction, bitumen, temperature effects, pH effect, road pavements, plastic recycling
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Environmental Pollution, Plastics, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review