Cited by 76Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Occurrence and contamination profile of legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Belgian wastewater using target, suspect and non-target screening approaches

Open access
Jeong, Yunsun, Da Silva, Katyeny Manuela, Iturrospe, Elias, Fuiji, Yukiko, Boogaerts, Tim, van Nuijs, Alexander L.N., Koelmel, Jeremy, Covaci, Adrian·2022·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

With the growing concern regarding the health risks of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), there is an increasing demand for the identification of emerging PFAS. This study provides a comprehensive investigation of legacy and emerging PFAS in 16 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Belgium using target, suspect, and non-target screening methods. Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) and perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA) were the dominant compounds in most locations, whereas perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was the most predominant PFAS in WWTP Deurne (Antwerp region). Using a suspect screening approach, 14 PFAS were annotated as confidence level (CL) of 4 or higher and 4 PFAS were annotated as CL 2a and 2b, including aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)-derived PFAS. The compound group of n:3 unsaturated fluorotelomer carboxylic acid was found using non-target screening in the wastewater from WWTP Deurne. Population exposure in a catchment area estimated using population-normalized mass loads (PNML) showed the highest value in the catchment area of WWTP Deurne, implying a potentially higher exposure to PFAS in this community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129378

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFAS measured in sewage treatment plants from Spain, Bavaria, Belgium, and Baltic Sea region showed lower concentrations in influent and effluent compared to those reported in this study.

    “PFAS measured in sewage treatment plants from Spain (Campo et al., 2014), Bavaria, Germany (Becker et al., 2010), Belgium (Jeong et al., 2022), and Baltic Sea region (Undeman et al., 2019; Lenka et al., 2021) showed lower concentrations in in fl uent and ef fl uent compared to those reported in our study.”

    From Occurrence of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances in wastewater treatment plants in Northern Italy (2023) · cites this paper as Jeong et al., 2022

    The Sample Collection section reports influent samples from 16 Belgian wastewater treatment plants, and the Additional information section says PFAS concentrations were measured. The cited paper does not report effluent measurements, so it supports the Belgian influent part of the citation but not the effluent part. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. abg9065 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 0c00261 · DOI

Authors
Jeong, Y., Da Silva, K. M., Iturrospe, E., Fuiji, Y., Boogaerts, T., van Nuijs, A. L. N., Koelmel, J., & Covaci, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Jeong, Yunsun
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
437
Pages
129378
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282822571
Cited by
76
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 829047)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1161620N)
  • Universiteit Antwerpen (DOCPRO 4, BOF DOCPRO4)
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K12262, 16K00565)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS contamination, wastewater treatment plants, legacy PFAS, emerging PFAS, suspect screening, non-target screening, perfluorobutanoic acid, PFPeA, perfluorooctanoic acid, aqueous film-forming foam, fluorotelomer carboxylic acids, population exposure, mass loading
MeSH terms
Belgium, Carboxylic Acids, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review