Impact of biological activated carbon filtration and backwashing on the behaviour of PFASs in drinking water treatment plants
Abstract
PFASs are present in surface water, tap water and even commercial drinking water and pose a risk to human health. In this study, the treatment efficiency of 14 PFASs was studied in a large drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) using Taihu Lake as the source, and it was found that the ozone/biological activated carbon (O 3-BAC) process was the most effective process for the removal of PFASs in DWTPs. For the O 3-BAC process, there were differences in the removal of PFASs by BACs (1,4,7,13 years) of different ages. The sterilization experiments revealed that for GAC, its physical adsorption capacity reached saturation after one year, while for BAC with mature biofilms, biosorption was the main mechanism for the removal of PFASs. The abundance of Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria in biofilms was positively correlated with the age of the BAC. The microbial community with higher abundance is beneficial to the biodegradation of organic matter and thus provides more active sites for the adsorption of PFASs. PFASs can leak in the early stage of filtration after backwashing, so it is necessary to pay close attention to the influent and effluent concentrations of PFASs during biofilm maturation after backwashing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depending on their chain lengths, PFAS can bioaccumulate on the biofilm of biological activated carbon filters.
“Depending on their chain lengths, PFAS can bioaccumulate on the biofilm of biological activated carbon filters [45].”
From A Mini-Review of Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Plants for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Removal: Possible Solutions and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Some studies have revealed that the ozonation-biological activated carbon process in DWTPs may be effective in removing PFAS from water.
“Some studies have revealed that the ozonation-biological activated carbon process in DWTPs may be effective in removing PFAS from water [44,45].”
From A Mini-Review of Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Plants for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Removal: Possible Solutions and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Zhong et al. reported different PFAS removal efficiencies for biological activated carbons of different ages in the ozonation-biological activated carbon process.
“Zhong et al. [45] reported different PFAS removal efficiencies for biological activated carbons of different ages in the ozonation-biological activated carbon process.”
From A Mini-Review of Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Plants for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Removal: Possible Solutions and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Zhong, T., Lin, T., Zhang, X., Jiang, F., & Chen, H.
- Affiliations
- Hohai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Tao
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 446
- Pages
- 130641
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313312659
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
- Keywords
- PFAS removal, biological activated carbon, drinking water treatment, backwashing, biofilm maturation, biosorption, physisorption, biofilm microbial community, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria
- MeSH terms
- Charcoal, Filtration, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Drinking Water
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review