Cited by 52Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Engineered Bacillus subtilis Biofilm@Biochar living materials for in-situ sensing and bioremediation of heavy metal ions pollution

Abstract

The simultaneous sensing and remediation of multiple heavy metal ions in wastewater or soil with microorganisms is currently a significant challenge. In this study, the microorganism Bacillus subtilis was used as a chassis organism to construct two genetic circuits for sensing and adsorbing heavy-metal ions. The engineered biosensor can sense three heavy metal ions (0.1-75 μM of Pb 2+ and Cu 2+ , 0.01-3.5 μM of Hg 2+ ) in situ real-time with high sensitivity. The engineered B. subtilis TasA-metallothionein (TasA-MT) biofilm can specifically adsorb metal ions from the environment, exhibiting remarkable removal efficiencies of 99.5% for Pb 2+ , 99.9% for Hg 2+ and 99.5% for Cu 2+ in water. Furthermore, this engineered strain (as a biosensor and absorber of Pb 2+ , Cu 2+ , and Hg 2+ ) was incubated with biochar to form a hybrid biofilm@biochar (BBC) material that could be applied in the bioremediation of heavy metal ions. The results showed that BBC material not only significantly reduced exchangeable Pb 2+ in the soil but also reduced Pb 2+ accumulation in maize plants. In addition, it enhanced maize growth and biomass. In conclusion, this study examined the potential applications of biosensors and hybrid living materials constructed using sensing and adsorption circuits in B. subtilis, providing rapid and cost-effective tools for sensing and remediating multiple heavy metal ions (Pb 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Cu 2+ ).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhu, X., Xiang, Q., Chen, L., Chen, J., Wang, L., Jiang, N., Hao, X., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Li, Y., Omer, R., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Zhuang, Y., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jiaofang
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
465
Pages
133119
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389805372
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 8
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (22ZR1416000)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0908900)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis, metallothionein, TasA, biofilm, biochar, heavy metal adsorption, lead, mercury, copper, bioremediation, soil remediation, maize, synthetic gene circuits, in situ sensing, living materials
MeSH terms
Bacillus subtilis, Biodegradation, Environmental, Charcoal, Ions, Lead, Mercury, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review