The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Visible Host: Does race guide Airbnb rental rates in San Francisco?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These revenue gaps are likely to have their origins in multiple factors; discrimination in guests choosing host on the basis of their profile picture [27,46–48], having limited access to housing wealth that is attractive to touristic consumption due to e.g. racial segregation [35,49]”
From How sharing is the “sharing economy”? Evidence from 97 Airbnb markets (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x · Cited by 6,238
Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com
Edelman, B. G., & Luca, M. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2377353 · Cited by 471
Field Experiment Tests for Discrimination against Hispanics in the U.S. Rental Housing Market
Hanson, A., & Santas, M. (2014) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2012.231 · Cited by 87
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Cutler, 1999, The rise and decline of the American ghetto, J. Political Economy, 107, 455, 10.1086/250069 · DOI
- Doleac, 2013, The visible hand: race and online market outcomes, Econ. J., 123, F469, 10.1111/ecoj.12082 · DOI
- Edelman, 2017, Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: evidence from a field experiment, Am. Econ. J., 9, 1
- Ewens, 2014, Statistical discrimination or prejudice? a large sample field experiment, Rev. Econ. Stat., 96, 119, 10.1162/REST_a_00365 · DOI
- Moro, 2009, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
- Newport, 2015, San francisco metro area ranks highest in LGBT percentage, Gallup
- Ondrich, 2003, Now you see it, now you don’t: why do real estate agents withhold available houses from black customers?, Rev. Econ. Stat., 85, 854, 10.1162/003465303772815772 · DOI
- Phelps, 1972, The statistical theory of racism and sexism, Am. Econ. Rev., 62, 659
- Pope, 2011, Whats in a picture? evidence of discrimination from prosper. com, J. Human Resour., 46, 53
- Szymanski, 2000, A market test for discrimination in the english professional soccer leagues, J. Political Economy, 108, 590, 10.1086/262130 · DOI
- Todisco, 2015, 67, 121
- Wang, 2015, The model minority? not on Airbnb. com: a Hedonic pricing model to quantify racial bias against Asian Americans, Technol. Sci.
Cited by
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129
Building trust in the sharing economy: Current approaches and future considerations
Räisänen, J., Ojala, A., & Tuovinen, T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123724 · Cited by 118
How sharing is the “sharing economy”? Evidence from 97 Airbnb markets
Törnberg, P. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266998 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kakar, V., Voelz, J., Wu, J., & Franco, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Housing Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 25-40
- ISSN
- 1051-1377
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
