Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis

Open access
Ripoll, Cristina, Groszmann, Roberto J., Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe, Bosch, Jaime, Grace, Norman, Burroughs, Andrew, Planas, Ramon, Escorsell, Angels, Garcia-Pagan, Juan Carlos, Makuch, Robert, Patch, David, Matloff, Daniel S.·2009·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Background/Aims A total of 213 patients with compensated cirrhosis, portal hypertension and no varices were included in a trial evaluating beta-blockers in preventing varices. Predictors of the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were analyzed. Methods Baseline laboratory tests, ultrasound and HVPG measurements were performed. Patients were followed prospectively every three months until development of varices or variceal bleeding or end of the study in 09/02. The endpoint was HCC development according to standard diagnostic criteria. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were developed to identify predictors of HCC. Results In a median follow-up of 58 months 26/213 (12.2%) patients developed HCC. Eight patients were transplanted and 28 patients died without HCC. Twenty-one (84%) HCC developed in patients with HCV. On multivariate analysis HVPG (HR 1.18; 95%CI 1.08–1.29), albumin (HR 0.34; 95%CI 0.14–0.83) and viral etiology (HR 4.59; 95%CI 1.51–13.92) were independent predictors of HCC development. ROC curves identified 10 mmHg of HVPG as the best cutoff; those who had an HVPG above this value had a 6-fold increase in the HCC incidence. Conclusions Portal hypertension is an independent predictor of HCC development. An HVPG >10 mmHg is associated with a 6-fold increase of HCC risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.01.014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Ripoll, C., Groszmann, R. J., Garcia-Tsao, G., Bosch, J., Grace, N., Burroughs, A., Planas, R., Escorsell, A., Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Makuch, R., Patch, D., & Matloff, D. S.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
923-928
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149727669
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhep.2009.01.014
The paper
Ripoll, C., Groszmann, R. J., Garcia-Tsao, G., Bosch, J., Grace, N., Burroughs, A., Planas, R., Escorsell, A., Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Makuch, R., Patch, D., & Matloff, D. S. (2009). Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2009.01.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.