The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of waiting list alpha-fetoprotein changes on the outcome of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Liver transplantation is a recognized treatment for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but transplant criteria still need to be refined, especially in the case of more advanced or downstaged tumors. METHODS The present study investigated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a predictor of outcome in 6817 patients listed with a diagnosis of HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. RESULTS Local pre-transplant HCC treatment was used in 41% of patients on the waiting list. Patients with AFP levels>400 ng/ml at the time of listing who were downstaged to AFP ≤400 ng/ml had better intent-to-treat survival than patients failing to reduce AFP to ≤400 (81% vs. 48% at 3 years, p ≤0.001) and comparable survival to patients with stable AFP ≤400 ng/ml (74%, p = 0.14). Patients with AFP levels decreased ≤400 ng/ml and patients with levels persistently ≤400 ng/ml also had similar drop-out rates from the list (10% in both groups) and post-transplant survival rates (89% vs. 78% at 3 years, p = 0.11). Such an AFP downstaging was associated with good survivals whatever the level of the original AFP (even if originally>1000 ng/ml). Only the last pre-transplant AFP independently predicted survival (p ≤0.001), unlike AFP at listing or AFP changes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, downstaging HCC patients with high AFP is feasible and leads to similar intent-to-treat and post-transplant survivals to those of patients with AFP persistently low. Only last AFP appears relevant for patient selection before transplantation and should be used in combination with morphological variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Sangro, B., Argemi, J., Ronot, M., Paradis, V., Meyer, T., Mazzaferro, V., Jepsen, P., Golfieri, R., Galle, P., Dawson, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028 · Cited by 985
Biology and significance of alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Foerster, F., Kudo, M., Chan, S. L., Llovet, J. M., Qin, S., Schelman, W. R., Chintharlapalli, S., Abada, P. B., Sherman, M., et al. (2019) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.14223 · Cited by 597
Mazzaferro, V., Bhoori, S., Sposito, C., Bongini, M., Langer, M., Miceli, R., & Mariani, L. (2011) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.22365 · Cited by 593
Hameed, B., Mehta, N., Sapisochin, G., Roberts, J. P., & Yao, F. Y. (2014) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.23904 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Merani, S., Majno, P., Kneteman, N. M., Berney, T., Morel, P., Mentha, G., & Toso, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-819
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028454653
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of waiting list alpha-fetoprotein changes on the outcome of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.040
- The paper
- Merani, S., Majno, P., Kneteman, N. M., Berney, T., Morel, P., Mentha, G., & Toso, C. (2011). The impact of waiting list alpha-fetoprotein changes on the outcome of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.