CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248Liver Disease and TransplantationSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment with non-selective beta blockers is associated with reduced severity of systemic inflammation and improved survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

Open access
Mookerjee, Rajeshwar P., Pavesi, Marco, Thomsen, Karen Louise, Mehta, Gautam, Macnaughtan, Jane, Bendtsen, Flemming, Coenraad, Minneke, Sperl, Jan, Gines, Pere, Moreau, Richard, Arroyo, Vicente, Jalan, Rajiv·2016·Journal of Hepatology
DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background & aims Non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) have been shown to have deleterious outcomes in patients with refractory ascites, alcoholic hepatitis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis leading many physicians to stop the drug in these cases. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by systemic inflammation and high mortality. As NSBBs may have beneficial effects on gut motility and permeability and, systemic inflammation, the aims of this prospective, observational study were to determine whether ongoing use of NSBBs reduced 28-day mortality in ACLF patients.Methods The study was performed in 349 patients with ACLF included in the CANONIC study, which is a prospective observational investigation in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with acute deterioration. The data about the use of NSBBs, its type and dosage was specifically recorded. Patient characteristics at enrollment significantly associated with treatment and mortality were taken into account as potential confounders to adjust for treatment effect. A logistic regression model was fitted.Results 164 (47%) ACLF patients received NSBBs whereas 185 patients did not. Although the CLIF-C ACLF scores were similar at presentation, more patients in the NSBB treated group had lower grades of ACLF (p=0.047) at presentation and significantly more patients improved. Forty patients (24.4%) died in NSBB treated group compared with 63 patients (34.1%) (p=0.048) [estimated risk-reduction 0.596 (95%CI: 0.361-0.985; p=0.0436)]. This improvement in survival was associated with a significantly lower white cell count (NSBB: 8.5 (5.8); no NSBB: 10.8 (6.6); p=0.002). No long-term improvement in survival was observed.Conclusions This study shows for the first time that ongoing treatment with NSBBs in cirrhosis is safe and reduces the mortality if they develop ACLF. Careful thought should be given before stopping NSBBs in cirrhotic patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.018

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 248

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mookerjee, R. P., Pavesi, M., Thomsen, K. L., Mehta, G., Macnaughtan, J., Bendtsen, F., Coenraad, M., Sperl, J., Gines, P., Moreau, R., Arroyo, V., & Jalan, R.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (ES)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Jalan, Rajiv
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
574-582
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.018
OpenAlex
W2219970668
Cited by
248
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25
FWCI
16.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0012141)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
non-selective beta-blockers, acute-on-chronic liver failure, liver cirrhosis, systemic inflammation, 28-day mortality, white blood cell count, CLIF-C ACLF score, intestinal motility, intestinal permeability
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Leukocyte Count, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models, Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review