Cited by 41Liver Disease and TransplantationStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Endpoints and design of clinical trials in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: Position paper of the LiverHope Consortium

Open access
Solà, Elsa, Pose, Elisa, Campion, Daniela, Piano, Salvatore, Roux, Olivier, Simon-Talero, Macarena, Uschner, Frank, de Wit, Koos +42 more·2021·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Management of decompensated cirrhosis is currently geared towards the treatment of complications once they occur. To date there is no established disease-modifying therapy aimed at halting progression of the disease and preventing the development of complications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The design of clinical trials to investigate new therapies for patients with decompensated cirrhosis is complex. The population of patients with decompensated cirrhosis is heterogeneous (i.e., different etiologies, comorbidities and disease severity), leading to the inclusion of diverse populations in clinical trials. In addition, primary endpoints selected for trials that include patients with decompensated cirrhosis are not homogeneous and at times may not be appropriate. This leads to difficulties in comparing results obtained from different trials. Against this background, the LiverHope Consortium organized a meeting of experts, the goal of which was to develop recommendations for the design of clinical trials and to define appropriate endpoints, both for trials aimed at modifying the natural history and preventing progression of decompensated cirrhosis, as well as for trials aimed at managing the individual complications of cirrhosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Best endpoints including transplant-free survival were treated as secondary outcomes in the MATCH phase II study.

    “and what are now considered the best endpoints, including (transplant-free) survival were treated as secondary outcomes in the MATCH phase II study (179).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [179]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis

    González del Barrio, L., Ipsen, D. H., Pfister, D. R., Hancz, D., & Scott, C. L. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1835489 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

    “…score is not the most optimal endpoint for evaluating therapeutic ef fi cacy in trials targeting fi brosis progression and resolution (177, 178), and what are now considered the best endpoints, including (transplant-free) survival were treated as secondary outcomes in the MATCH phase II study (179).”

Authors
Solà, E., Pose, E., Campion, D., Piano, S., Roux, O., Simon-Talero, M., Uschner, F., de Wit, K., Zaccherini, G., Alessandria, C., Beuers, U., Caraceni, P., Francoz, C., Mookerjee, R. P., Trebicka, J., Vargas, V., Serra, M., Torres, F., Montagnese, S., Krag, A., Hernaez, R., Korenjak, M., Watson, H., Abraldes, J. G., Kamath, P. S., Ginès, P., Durand, F., Bernardi, M., Solé, C., Pich, J., Graupera, I., Napoleone, L., Jiménez, C., Juanola, A., Avitabile, E., Ma, A., Fabrellas, N., Carol, M., Palacio, E., Aban, M., Lanzillotti, T., Nicolao, G., Chiappa, M. T., Esnault, V., Forner, A., Graf-Dirmeier, S., Helder, J., Lopez, M., Cervera, M., & Pérez-Guasch, M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ginès, Pere
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
200-219
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083453401
Cited by
41
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
decompensated cirrhosis, clinical trial design, primary endpoint, disease-modifying therapy, disease progression, cirrhosis complications, trial heterogeneity, natural history (disease)
MeSH terms
Ascites, Clinical Trials as Topic, Europe, Hepatic Encephalopathy, Humans, Hypertension, Portal, Liver Cirrhosis, Quality of Life, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Disease Progression, Disease Management, Endpoint Determination, Consensus, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review