Association of bezafibrate with transplant-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis
Open accessAbstract
Background & aims A beneficial effect of bezafibrate (BZF) on symptoms and biochemical features of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been reported in patients with an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but long-term effects on survival remain unknown. In Japan, BZF has been used as a de facto second-line therapy for PBC since 2000. Herein, we compared the survival rates between patients treated with and those without BZF in a large nationwide Japanese PBC cohort. Methods All consecutively registered patients of this cohort who started UDCA therapy from 2000 onwards and had a follow-up ≥1 year were included. Association between BZF exposure and mortality or need for liver transplantation (LT) was assessed using time-dependent, multivariable-and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Clinical benefit was quantified using the number needed to treat (NNT). Results Of 3,908 eligible patients, 3,162 (81%) received UDCA only and 746 (19%) UDCA and BZF over 17,360 and 3,932 patient-years, respectively. During follow-up, 183 deaths (89 liver-related) and 21 LT were registered. Exposure to combination therapy was associated with a significant decrease in all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT (adjusted hazard ratios: 0.3253, 95% CI 0.1936-0.5466 and 0.2748, 95% CI 0.1336-0.5655, respectively; p <0.001 for both). This association was consistent across various risk groups at baseline. The NNTs with combination therapy to prevent 1 additional death or LT over 5, 10, and 15 years were 29 (95% CI 22-46), 14 (10-22), and 8 (6-15), respectively. Conclusions In a large retrospective cohort study of treatment effects in patients with PBC, the addition of BZF to UDCA was associated with improved prognosis. Lay summary The long-term efficacy of bezafibrate (BZF) on liver transplantation (LT) - free survival in patients with PBC and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains to be determined. In this Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study, the use of UDCA-BZF combination therapy, compared to UDCA alone, was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT. These results indicate that BZF is so far the only drug in PBC to have demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms, biochemical markers, and long-term outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysis of a large-scale retrospective database of 3908 patients in Japan showed that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality or liver transplant (adjusted HR 0.3253) and liver-related death or liver transplant (adjusted HR 0.2748) compared with ursodeoxycholic acid alone (p<0.001 for both).
“analysis of a large-scale retrospective database of 3908 patients in Japan, where bezafibrate had been used as a de facto second-line treatment, showed that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality or liver transplant and liver-related death or liver transplant compared with ursodeoxycholic acid alone (adjusted HR 0•3253 for all-”
From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [103]
The efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate was shown using real-world data.
“It is worth noting that the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate was shown using real-world data.82,103”
From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [103]
For PPAR agonists, only bezafibrate has been shown to enhance long-term prognosis according to real-world data.
“However, for PPAR agonists, only bezafibrate has been shown to enhance long-term prognosis according to real-world data.103”
From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [103]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Tanaka, A., Hirohara, J., Nakano, T., Matsumoto, K., Chazouillères, O., Takikawa, H., Hansen, B. E., Carrat, F., & Corpechot, C.
- Affiliations
- Teikyo University (JP)
- Kansai Medical University (JP)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- University Health Network (CA)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Tanaka, Atsushi
- Corpechot, Christophe
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 565-571
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3154020224
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hepatology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JPMH20FC1023)
- GlaxoSmithKline Japan
- Gilead Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- primary biliary cirrhosis, bezafibrate, ursodeoxycholic acid, transplant-free survival, liver transplantation, mortality, combination therapy, second-line therapy, number needed to treat, Japanese patients, prognosis, bile acid sequestrants, fibrate therapy, propensity score adjustment, cohort studies, long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bezafibrate, Female, Humans, Japan, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review