Impact of non-invasive biomarkers on hepatology practice: past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
Over the last two decades, there have been tremendous advances in the non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification of chronic liver diseases (CLDs). Non-invasive approaches are based on the quantification of biomarkers in serum samples or on the measurement of liver stiffness, using either ultrasound- or magnetic resonance-based elastography techniques. The fibrosis-4 index (non-patented) and enhanced liver fibrosis test (patented) are the most widely adopted serum markers, whereas vibration-controlled transient elastography is the most widely adopted elastography technique. In this review, we discuss the role of non-invasive tests in the current era, as well as their accuracy and how their use in clinical practice has changed the practice of hepatology, including identification of early cirrhosis in patients with risk factors for CLD, diagnosis of portal hypertension, establishing prognosis in compensated cirrhosis, guiding antiviral treatment, and screening for fibrosis and cirrhosis in primary care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other ultrasound-based methods implementable with common ultrasound devices are two-dimensional shear wave elastography and point shear wave elastography.
“Other ultrasound-based methods implementable with common ultrasound devices are twodimensional shear wave elastography and point shear wave elastography.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [153]
MRE for assessment of liver stiffness requires specialised hardware to generate mechanical waves and dedicated acquisition techniques, which are only available at a few sites.
“MRelastography (MRE) for assessment of liver stiffness requires specialised hardware to generate mechanical waves and dedicated acquisition techniques, which are only available at a few sites.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [153]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 174 · Cited by 224
- Authors
- Anstee, Q. M., Castera, L., & Loomba, R.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Anstee, Quentin M.
- Loomba, Rohit
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1362-1378
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280528077
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 174
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hepatology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL147835)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK124318, R01DK121378, R01DK106419, P30DK120515, U01DK061734, U01DK130190)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Keywords
- non-invasive biomarkers, chronic liver disease, liver fibrosis, liver stiffness, elastography, vibration-controlled transient elastography, FIB-4, risk stratification, portal hypertension, antiviral therapy monitoring, primary care screening
- MeSH terms
- Biopsy, Gastroenterology, Humans, Hypertension, Portal, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Biomarkers, Elasticity Imaging Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review