Cited by 101Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver physiology and pathologyLiver Diseases and Immunity

Hepatic and renal improvements with FXR agonist vonafexor in individuals with suspected fibrotic NASH

Open access
Ratziu, Vlad, Harrison, Stephen A., Loustaud-Ratti, Véronique, Bureau, Christophe, Lawitz, Eric, Abdelmalek, Manal, Alkhouri, Naim, Francque, Sven +7 more·2023·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The LIVIFY trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vonafexor, a second-generation, non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist in patients with suspected fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). METHODS: This double-blind phase IIa study was conducted in two parts. Patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo, vonafexor 100 mg twice daily (VONA-100BID), vonafexor 200 mg once daily (VONA-200QD), or 400 mg vonafexor QD (VONA-400QD) in Part A (safety run-in, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) or placebo, vonafexor 100 mg QD (VONA-100QD), or VONA-200QD (1:1:1) in Part B. The primary efficacy endpoint was a reduction in liver fat content (LFC) by MRI-proton density fat fraction, while secondary endpoints included reduced corrected T1 values and liver enzymes, from baseline to Week 12. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomised (Part A, n = 24; Part B, n = 96). In Part B, there was a significant reduction in least-square mean (SE) absolute change in LFC from baseline to Week 12 for VONA-100QD (-6.3% [0.9]) and VONA-200QD (-5.4% [0.9]), vs. placebo (-2.3% [0.9], p = 0.002 and 0.012, respectively). A >30% relative LFC reduction was achieved by 50.0% and 39.3% of patients in the VONA-100QD and VONA-200QD arms, respectively, but only in 12.5% in the placebo arm. Reductions in body weight, liver enzymes, and corrected T1 were also observed with vonafexor. Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate improved in the active arms but not the placebo arm. Mild to moderate generalised pruritus was reported in 6.3%, 9.7%, and 18.2% of participants in the placebo, VONA-100QD, and VONA-200QD arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected fibrotic NASH, vonafexor was safe and induced potent liver fat reduction, improvement in liver enzymes, weight loss, and a possible renal benefit. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER (EUDRACT): 2018-003119-22. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03812029. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Affected patients are also at higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease. There are no approved therapies and only few options to treat this population. The phase IIa LIVIFY trial results show that single daily administration of oral vonafexor, an FXR agonist, leads in the short term to a reduction in liver fat, liver enzymes, fibrosis biomarkers, body weight and abdominal circumference, and a possible improvement in kidney function, while possible mild moderate pruritus (a peripheral FXR class effect) and an LDL-cholesterol increase are manageable with lower doses and statins. These results support exploration in longer and larger trials, with the aim of addressing the unmet medical need in NASH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.023

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 101

Authors
Ratziu, V., Harrison, S. A., Loustaud-Ratti, V., Bureau, C., Lawitz, E., Abdelmalek, M., Alkhouri, N., Francque, S., Girma, H., Darteil, R., Couchoux, H., Wolf, M., Sanyal, A., Vonderscher, J., & Scalfaro, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Pinnacle Clinical Research (US)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Arizona Liver Health (US)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Ratziu, Vlad
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
479-492
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308294171
Cited by
101
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Medpace
  • BioClinica
  • University of Cambridge
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
farnesoid X receptor agonist, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, liver fat, proton density fat fraction, glomerular filtration rate, renal function, pruritus, dose comparison, liver enzymes, weight loss
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Kidney, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Treatment Outcome, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review