Cited by 327Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

A prospective study on the prevalence of NAFLD, advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in people with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Ajmera, Veeral, Cepin, Sandra, Tesfai, Kaleb, Hofflich, Heather, Cadman, Karen, Lopez, Scarlett, Madamba, Egbert, Bettencourt, Ricki +4 more·2023·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims There are limited prospective data on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) specifically enrolled and systematically assessed for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in a prospectively recruited cohort of adults with T2DM.Methods This prospective study enrolled adults aged ≥50 years with T2DM, recruited from primary care or endocrinology clinics. Participants underwent a standardized clinical research visit with MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and controlled-attenuation parameter. NAFLD was defined as MRI-PDFF ≥5% after exclusion of other liver diseases. Advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were defined by established liver stiffness cut-off points on MRE or VCTE if MRE was not available.Results Of 524 patients screened, 501 adults (63% female) with T2DM met eligibility. The mean age and BMI were 64.6 (±8.1) years and 31.4 (±5.9) kg/m 2, respectively. The prevalence of NAFLD, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 65%, 14% and 6%, respectively. In multivariable adjusted models, adjusted for age and sex, obesity and insulin use were associated with increased odds of advanced fibrosis (odds ratio 2.50; 95% CI 1.38-4.54; p = 0.003 and odds ratio 2.71; 95% CI 1.33-5.50; p = 0.006, respectively). Among 29 patients with cirrhosis, two were found to have hepatocellular carcinoma and one patient had gallbladder adenocarcinoma.Conclusion Utilizing a uniquely well-phenotyped prospective cohort of patients aged ≥50 years with T2DM, we found that the prevalence of advanced fibrosis was 14% and that of cirrhosis was 6%. These data underscore the high risk of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis in adults aged ≥50 years with T2DM.Impact and implications Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), however, there are limited prospective data characterizing the prevalence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis using the most accurate non-invasive biomarkers of liver fat and fibrosis. We show that 14% of older adults with T2DM have advanced fibrosis and 6% have cirrhosis, which places them at risk for liver failure and liver cancer. Accurate prevalence rates and comparative analysis regarding the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests in this population will guide the optimal screening strategy and future cost-effectiveness analyses. These results will inform future Hepatology and Endocrinology practice guidelines regarding NAFLD screening programs in older adults with T2DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.11.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence and duration of T2D is the major determinant of fibrosis progression and HCC development in people with MASLD.

    “The presence and duration of T2D is the major determinant of fi brosis progression and HCC development in people with MASLD.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results section ('Obesity enhances the risk of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis'; page unavailable) says diabetes duration was not significantly associated with advanced fibrosis; obesity and insulin use were associated instead. The Discussion links T2D to progressive NAFLD and increased HCC risk, but does not establish its duration as a major determinant of fibrosis progression or HCC development. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • T2D is associated with an increased risk of liver fibrosis assessed by VCTE and/or MR-based techniques, or with a prevalence of advanced (F3-F4) fibrosis on histology in biopsy-proven MASLD/MASH ranging from 30 to 38%.

    “T2D is associated with an increased risk of liver fi brosis, assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and/or magnetic resonance (MR)-based techniques, 51 or with the prevalence of advanced (F3-F4) fi brosis on histology in biopsy-proven MASLD/MASH, ranging from 30 to 38%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 327

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Takahashi Y, Itakura Y, Inada K, Kirino S, Liver fibrosis and fatty liver are independently associated with cardiovascular disease risk. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021 Oct; 36(10): 2960– 2966. 34154037

Authors
Ajmera, V., Cepin, S., Tesfai, K., Hofflich, H., Cadman, K., Lopez, S., Madamba, E., Bettencourt, R., Richards, L., Behling, C., Sirlin, C. B., & Loomba, R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Loomba, Rohit
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
471-478
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309474217
Cited by
327
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 2
FWCI
44.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL147835)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK119460)
  • Gilead Sciences
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (5UL1TR001442, P30DK120515, R01DK106419, R01DK121378, R01DK124318, U01DK061734, U01DK130190)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA029019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, advanced liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, prevalence, older adults, obesity, insulin use, liver stiffness, proton density fat fraction, magnetic resonance elastography, vibration-controlled transient elastography, controlled attenuation parameter, noninvasive fibrosis assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Fibrosis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Prospective Studies, Prevalence, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review