99% of patients with NAFLD meet MASLD criteria and natural history is therefore identical
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The vast majority of patients with confirmed NAFLD meet the criteria for MASLD, so historical NAFLD/NASH data remain relevant overall.
“According to recent reviews, the vast majority of patients with confirmed NAFLD meet the criteria for MASLD [34,35,36], so historical data remain relevant overall.”
From The HepG2 Cell Line as a Model for Studying Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 372
- Authors
- Hagström, H., Vessby, J., Ekstedt, M., & Shang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hagström, Hannes
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e76-e77
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386529182
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca Mölndal
- Echosens
- Pfizer
- Gilead Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, natural history (disease), hepatic steatosis, cardiometabolic risk factors, nomenclatural changes, type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prediabetes
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
