Cited by 86Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyMorphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: Description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication

Kaifu, Yousuke, Baba, Hisao, Sutikna, Thomas, Morwood, Michael J., Kubo, Daisuke, Saptomo, E. Wahyu, Jatmiko, Rokhus Due Awe +1 more·2011·Journal of Human Evolution

Abstract

This paper describes in detail the external morphology of LB1/1, the nearly complete and only known cranium of Homo floresiensis. Comparisons were made with a large sample of early groups of the genus Homo to assess primitive, derived, and unique craniofacial traits of LB1 and discuss its evolution. Principal cranial shape differences between H. floresiensis and Homo sapiens are also explored metrically. The LB1 specimen exhibits a marked reductive trend in its facial skeleton, which is comparable to the H. sapiens condition and is probably associated with reduced masticatory stresses. However, LB1 is craniometrically different from H. sapiens showing an extremely small overall cranial size, and the combination of a primitive low and anteriorly narrow vault shape, a relatively prognathic face, a rounded oval foramen that is greatly separated anteriorly from the carotid canal/jugular foramen, and a unique, tall orbital shape. Whereas the neurocranium of LB1 is as small as that of some Homo habilis specimens, it exhibits laterally expanded parietals, a weak suprameatal crest, a moderately flexed occipital, a marked facial reduction, and many other derived features that characterize post-habilis Homo. Other craniofacial characteristics of LB1 include, for example, a relatively narrow frontal squama with flattened right and left sides, a marked frontal keel, posteriorly divergent temporal lines, a posteriorly flexed anteromedial corner of the mandibular fossa, a bulbous lateral end of the supraorbital torus, and a forward protruding maxillary body with a distinct infraorbital sulcus. LB1 is most similar to early Javanese Homo erectus from Sangiran and Trinil in these and other aspects. We conclude that the craniofacial morphology of LB1 is consistent with the hypothesis that H. floresiensis evolved from early Javanese H. erectus with dramatic island dwarfism. However, further field discoveries of early hominin skeletal remains from Flores and detailed analyses of the finds are needed to understand the evolutionary history of this endemic hominin species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 130 · Cited by 86

Authors
Kaifu, Y., Baba, H., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Kubo, D., Saptomo, E. W., Jatmiko, Awe, R. D., & Djubiantono, T.
Affiliations
  • National Museum of Nature and Science (JP)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Kaifu, Yousuke
Venue
Journal of Human Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
644-682
ISSN
0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056347211
Cited by
86
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Museum of Nature and Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Homo floresiensis, LB1, craniometry, craniofacial morphology, Homo erectus, island dwarfism, taxonomic affinities, Homo habilis, human, facial reduction, masticatory stress, orbital shape, neurocranium
MeSH terms
Animals, Cephalometry, Biological Evolution, Face, Female, Fossils, Indonesia, Skull, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Hominidae, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review