A uniquely modern human pattern of endocranial development. Insights from a new cranial reconstruction of the Neandertal newborn from Mezmaiskaya
Abstract
The globular braincase of modern humans is distinct from all fossil human species, including our closest extinct relatives, the Neandertals. Such adult shape differences must ultimately be rooted in different developmental patterns, but it is unclear at which point during ontogeny these group characteristics emerge. Here we compared internal shape changes of the braincase from birth to adulthood in Neandertals (N = 10), modern humans (N = 62), and chimpanzees (N = 62). Incomplete fossil specimens, including the two Neandertal newborns from Le Moustier 2 and Mezmaiskaya, were reconstructed using reference-based estimation methods. We used 3D geometric morphometrics to statistically compare shapes of virtual endocasts extracted from computed-tomographic scans. Throughout the analysis, we kept track of possible uncertainties due to the missing data values and small fossil sample sizes. We find that some aspects of endocranial development are shared by the three species. However, in the first year of life, modern humans depart from this presumably ancestral pattern of development. Newborn Neandertals and newborn modern humans have elongated braincases, and similar endocranial volumes. During a 'globularization-phase' modern human endocasts change to the globular shape that is characteristic for Homo sapiens. This phase of early development is unique to modern humans, and absent from chimpanzees and Neandertals. Our results support the notion that Neandertals and modern humans reach comparable adult brain sizes via different developmental pathways. The differences between these two human groups are most prominent directly after birth, a critical phase for cognitive development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changes in PTEN, TCF3, and other genes (CCND2, GLI3, RB1CC1) could have contributed to the brain growth trajectory changes hypothesized to give rise to the modern human-specific globular braincase shape during the past several 100,000 years.
“could have contributed to the brain growth trajectory changes hypothesized to give rise to the modern human-specific globular braincase shape during the past several 100,000 years9,11,15.”
From A catalog of single nucleotide changes distinguishing modern humans from archaic hominins (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 147 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Gunz, P., Neubauer, S., Golovanova, L., Doronichev, V., Maureille, B., & Hublin, J.-J.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Gunz, Philipp
- Venue
- Journal of Human Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-313
- ISSN
- 0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032848370
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 147
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 91.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Neanderthals, human, endocranial volume, chimpanzees, skull reconstruction, ontogeny, brain size evolution, cognitive development
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Anthropology, Physical, Brain, Pan troglodytes, Computer Simulation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Biological Evolution, Humans, Infant, Russia, Skull, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Principal Component Analysis, Neanderthals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review