Craniofacial modularity, character analysis, and the evolution of the premaxilla in early African hominins
Abstract
Phylogenetic analyses require evolutionarily independent characters, but there is no consensus, nor has there been a clear methodology presented on how to define character independence in a phylogenetic context, particularly within a complex morphological structure such as the skull. Following from studies of craniofacial development, we hypothesize that the premaxilla is an independent evolutionary module with two integrated characters that have traditionally been treated as independent. We test this hypothesis on a large sample of primate skulls and find evidence supporting the premaxilla as an independent module within the larger module of the palate. Additionally, our data indicate that the convexity of the nasoalveolar clivus and the contour of the alveolus are integrated within the premaxilla. We show that the palate itself is composed of two distinct modules: the FNP-derived premaxillae and the mxBA1-derived maxillae and palatines. Application of our data to early African hominin facial morphology suggests that at least three separate transitions contributed to robust facial morphology: 1) an increase in the size of the post-canine dentition housed within the maxillae and palatines, 2) modification of the premaxilla generating a concave clivus and reduced incisor alveolus, and 3) modification of the zygomatic, shifting the zygomatic root and lateral face anteriorly. These data lend support to the monophyly of Paranthropus boisei and Paranthropus robustus, and provide mounting evidence in favor of a Paranthropus clade. This study also highlights the utility of applying developmental evidence to studies of morphological evolution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Independent evolution of the maxillary and premaxillary components of the early hominin midface is consistent with hypotheses of modular development of the face.
“Independent evolution of the maxillary and premaxillary components of the early hominin midface is consistent with hypotheses of modular development of the face 13”
From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 120 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Villmoare, B. A., Dunmore, C., Kilpatrick, S., Oertelt, N., Depew, M. J., & Fish, J. L.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- University College London (GB)
- San Francisco General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Villmoare, Brian A.
- Fish, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 143-154
- ISSN
- 0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077263314
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0424193)
- Leakey Foundation
- AAPA Career Development Grant
- Human Frontiers Science Program Long-term Fellowship (LT 01061/2007-L)
- National Institutes of Health F32 Fellowship (1F32DE021929-01)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- premaxilla, character independence, Paranthropus boisei, Paranthropus robustus, palate, craniofacial development, primate skull
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Face, Fossils, Maxilla, Skull, Hominidae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review