Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR)

Panahi, Mahdi, Sadhasivam, Nitheshnirmal, Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza, Rezaie, Fatemeh, Lee, Saro·2020·Journal of Hydrology

Abstract

Abstract Freshwater shortages have become much more common globally in recent years. Water resources that are naturally available beneath the surface are capable of reversing this condition. Spatial modeling of groundwater distribution is an important undertaking that would aid in subsequent conservation and management of groundwater resources. In this study, groundwater potential maps were developed using a machine learning algorithm (MLA) and a deep learning algorithm (DLA), specifically the support vector regression (SVR) and convolution neural network (CNN) functions, respectively. Initially, 140 groundwater datasets were created through an extensive survey and then arbitrarily divided into groups of 100 (70%) and 40 (30%) datasets for model calibration and testing, respectively. Next, 15 groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), including catchment area (CA), convergence index (CI), convexity (Co), diurnal anisotropic heating (DH), flow path (FP), slope angle (SA), slope height (SH), topographic position index (TPI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), slope length (LS) factor, mass balance index (MBI), texture (TX), valley depth (VD), land cover (LC), and geology (GG) were produced and applied for model training. Finally, the calibrated model was validated using both training and testing data, and the independent measure of the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC). For validation using training data, the AUC values of CNN and SVR were 0.844 and 0.75, whereas those of CNN and SVR during validation with the testing data were 0.843 and 0.75. Therefore, CNN has better predictive ability than SVR. The findings of this study will help policymakers develop better strategies for conservation and management of groundwater resources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125033

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Metadata

Authors
Panahi, M., Sadhasivam, N., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaie, F., & Lee, S.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
588
Pages
125033
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023830374
Cited by
375
References
70
FWCI
16.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125033
The paper
Panahi, M., Sadhasivam, N., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaie, F., & Lee, S. (2020). Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR). Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.