The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR)
Abstract
Abstract Freshwater shortages have become much more common globally in recent years. Water resources that are naturally available beneath the surface are capable of reversing this condition. Spatial modeling of groundwater distribution is an important undertaking that would aid in subsequent conservation and management of groundwater resources. In this study, groundwater potential maps were developed using a machine learning algorithm (MLA) and a deep learning algorithm (DLA), specifically the support vector regression (SVR) and convolution neural network (CNN) functions, respectively. Initially, 140 groundwater datasets were created through an extensive survey and then arbitrarily divided into groups of 100 (70%) and 40 (30%) datasets for model calibration and testing, respectively. Next, 15 groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), including catchment area (CA), convergence index (CI), convexity (Co), diurnal anisotropic heating (DH), flow path (FP), slope angle (SA), slope height (SH), topographic position index (TPI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), slope length (LS) factor, mass balance index (MBI), texture (TX), valley depth (VD), land cover (LC), and geology (GG) were produced and applied for model training. Finally, the calibrated model was validated using both training and testing data, and the independent measure of the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC). For validation using training data, the AUC values of CNN and SVR were 0.844 and 0.75, whereas those of CNN and SVR during validation with the testing data were 0.843 and 0.75. Therefore, CNN has better predictive ability than SVR. The findings of this study will help policymakers develop better strategies for conservation and management of groundwater resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang, X., Wang, G., Cai, J., et al. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · Cited by 6,576
Convolutional neural networks for large-scale remote-sensing image classification
Maggiori, E., Tarabalka, Y., Charpiat, G., & Alliez, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2016.2612821 · Cited by 1,114
Physical Basis of the Length‐slope Factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation
Moore, I. D., & Burch, G. J. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000050042x · Cited by 998
Metadata
- Authors
- Panahi, M., Sadhasivam, N., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaie, F., & Lee, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 588
- Pages
- 125033
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023830374
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 16.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125033
- The paper
- Panahi, M., Sadhasivam, N., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaie, F., & Lee, S. (2020). Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR). Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.