Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from aquatic macrophyte debris and its ability to adsorb anthraquinone dyes

Chu, Shu Yi, Xiao, Ji Bo, Tian, Guang Ming, Wong, Ming Hung·2014·Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.035

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Xiao, 2012, Environ. Technol., 33, 553
  2. Wu, 2011, Environ. Sci., 32, 995
  3. Huang, 2013, Desalin. Water Treat.
  4. Kayranli, 2011, Biochem. Eng. J., 173, 782
  5. Baseri, 2012, Int. J. Chem. Res., 3, 36

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chu, S. Y., Xiao, J. B., Tian, G. M., & Wong, M. H.
Venue
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
3461-3466
ISSN
1226-086X
Cited by
18
References
42
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • National Major Science and Technology Specific Projects on Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China
  • Key Project of Zhejiang Province

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from aquatic macrophyte debris and its ability to adsorb anthraquinone dyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.035
The paper
Chu, S. Y., Xiao, J. B., Tian, G. M., & Wong, M. H. (2014). Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from aquatic macrophyte debris and its ability to adsorb anthraquinone dyes. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.