Crusted scabies: clinical and immunological findings in seventy-eight patients and a review of the literature.
Abstract
Objectives To describe the clinical and immunological features of crusted scabies in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 78 patients.Methods All patients requiring inpatient treatment for crusted scabies in the 'top end' of the northern territory of Australia over a 10 year period were prospectively identified. Demographics, risk factors, and immunological parameters were retrospectively compiled from their medical records and pathology databases.Results More than half the patients with crusted scabies had identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. Eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels occurred in 58% and 96% of patients, respectively, with median IgE levels 17 times the upper limit of normal. Seventeen percent had a history of leprosy but 42% had no identifiable risk factors. There was a decrease in mortality after the introduction of a treatment protocol consisting of multiple doses of ivermectin combined with topical scabicides and keratolytic therapy.Conclusions Crusted scabies often occurs in patients with identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. In patients without such risk factors, it is possible that the crusted response to infection results from a tendency to preferentially mount a Th2 response. The treatment regime described was associated with a reduction in mortality. This is the largest reported case series of crusted scabies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crusted scabies is transmitted more easily than scabies.
“Crusted scabies is transmitted more easily than scabies (1418).”
From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1418]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 356
- Authors
- Roberts, L. J., Huffam, S. E., Walton, S. F., & Currie, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Currie, B.J.
- Venue
- Journal of Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 375-381
- ISSN
- 0163-4453 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070570959
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Infection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- crusted scabies, Norwegian scabies, immunosuppression, eosinophilia, IgE, Th2 immune response, leprosy, ivermectin, keratolytic therapy, mortality, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antiparasitic Agents, Australia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Eosinophilia, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Infant, Newborn, Ivermectin, Keratolytic Agents, Leprosy, Middle Aged, Review Literature as Topic, Risk Factors, Scabies, Immunocompromised Host
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review