Cited by 356Dermatological diseases and infestationsDermatology and Skin DiseasesParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Crusted scabies: clinical and immunological findings in seventy-eight patients and a review of the literature.

Roberts, L.J., Huffam, S.E., Walton, S.F., Currie, B.J.·2005·Journal of Infection

Abstract

Objectives To describe the clinical and immunological features of crusted scabies in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 78 patients.Methods All patients requiring inpatient treatment for crusted scabies in the 'top end' of the northern territory of Australia over a 10 year period were prospectively identified. Demographics, risk factors, and immunological parameters were retrospectively compiled from their medical records and pathology databases.Results More than half the patients with crusted scabies had identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. Eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels occurred in 58% and 96% of patients, respectively, with median IgE levels 17 times the upper limit of normal. Seventeen percent had a history of leprosy but 42% had no identifiable risk factors. There was a decrease in mortality after the introduction of a treatment protocol consisting of multiple doses of ivermectin combined with topical scabicides and keratolytic therapy.Conclusions Crusted scabies often occurs in patients with identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. In patients without such risk factors, it is possible that the crusted response to infection results from a tendency to preferentially mount a Th2 response. The treatment regime described was associated with a reduction in mortality. This is the largest reported case series of crusted scabies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.08.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 356

Authors
Roberts, L. J., Huffam, S. E., Walton, S. F., & Currie, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Currie, B.J.
Venue
Journal of Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
375-381
ISSN
0163-4453 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070570959
Cited by
356
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
crusted scabies, Norwegian scabies, immunosuppression, eosinophilia, IgE, Th2 immune response, leprosy, ivermectin, keratolytic therapy, mortality, risk factors
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antiparasitic Agents, Australia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Eosinophilia, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Infant, Newborn, Ivermectin, Keratolytic Agents, Leprosy, Middle Aged, Review Literature as Topic, Risk Factors, Scabies, Immunocompromised Host

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review