Increasing incidence of Candida parapsilosis candidemia with caspofungin usage.
Abstract
Objectives To determine the impact on the change in epidemiology of Candida species at our institution since the introduction of caspofungin.Methods A 5-year retrospective review of all candidemia at a major tertiary care center. Only one episode of candidemia per patient per admission was counted. All antifungal defined daily doses were also collected in this same time period. Regression analysis was performed on the data and correlation statistics among antifungal use and Candida species were assessed using a Pearson correlation analysis.Results There were 469 individual episodes of candidemia between fiscal year 2002 and 2006 with the rate increasing every year. On regression analysis there was a significant increase in Candida parapsilosis candidemia (R(2)=0.90, p=0.02) and significant increase in caspofungin usage (R(2)=0.80, p<0.01), with a correspondingly significant decline in conventional (R(2)=-0.77, p<0.01) and lipid amphotericin B (R(2)=-0.95, p<0.05) usage. We found correlations between increased caspofungin usage (R(2)=0.94, p=0.017) and increased C. parapsilosis candidemia and decreased Candida tropicalis candidemia (R(2)=0.92, p<0.05) and a trend towards decreased Candida glabrata (R(2)=0.64, p=0.1).Conclusions We showed significant correlations between increased caspofungin usage and an increased incidence of C. parapsilosis candidemia and reduction in C. tropicalis candidemia, with a trend towards less C. glabrata candidemia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rising incidence of C. parapsilosis in some medical centers has been linked to increased echinocandin use.
“Indeed, the rising incidence of C. parapsilosis in some medical centers has been linked to increased echinocandin use [86,87].”
From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [86]
Increasing echinocandin use was accompanied by epidemiological shifts with a proportional or numeric increase in the less susceptible C. parapsilosis at several centres.
“Quite soon after the introduction of the echinocandins it was noted that the increasing use was accompanied by epidemiological shifts with a proportional or numeric increase in the less susceptible C. parapsilosis at several centres (8;17;18).”
From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Forrest, G. N., Weekes, E., & Johnson, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Maryland Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-129
- ISSN
- 0163-4453 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092667553
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Infection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- caspofungin, candidemia incidence, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, lipid amphotericin B, invasive fungal infections
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Caspofungin, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Maryland, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Regression Analysis, Fluconazole, Incidence, Fungemia, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review