Cited by 26Insect symbiosis and bacterial influencesInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Bidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility caused by Wolbachia in the terrestrial isopod Porcellio dilatatus

Sicard, Mathieu, Bouchon, Didier, Ceyrac, Laura, Raimond, Roland, Thierry, Magali, Le Clec’h, Winka, Marcadé, Isabelle, Caubet, Yves +1 more·2014·Journal of Invertebrate Pathology

Abstract

In the terrestrial isopod species Porcellio dilatatus, unidirectional Cytoplasmic Incompatibility (CI) between two morphs (P. d. dilatatus and P. d. petiti) caused by a Wolbachia strain (wPet) infecting the morph P. d. petiti has been previously described by experiments initiated four decades ago. Here, we studied another Wolbachia that has been recently detected in a population of the morph P. d. dilatatus. The MLST markers reveal that this Wolbachia is a new strain called wDil distinct from wPet also belonging to the isopod clade of Wolbachia. Quantifications of both Wolbachia strains in the gonads of the two P. dilatatus morphs revealed that all males exhibit similar Wolbachia titers while the titers in females depend on the Wolbachia strain they host. Crossing experiments showed that both wDil and wPet induced partial unidirectional CI with different intensities. Moreover, these two strains induced bidirectional CI when individuals were both infected with one of the two different Wolbachia strains. This way, we demonstrated that P. dilatatus can be infected by two closely related Wolbachia strains (wDil and wPet), that seem to have different modification-rescue systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jip.2014.06.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sicard, M., Bouchon, D., Ceyrac, L., Raimond, R., Thierry, M., Le Clec’h, W., Marcadé, I., Caubet, Y., & Grève, P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Grève, Pierre
Venue
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
121
Pages
28-36
ISSN
0022-2011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047645222
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Invertebrate Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Wolbachia, cytoplasmic incompatibility, Porcellio dilatatus, terrestrial isopods, gonads, morphs, MLST typing
MeSH terms
Animals, Crosses, Genetic, Cytoplasm, DNA, Bacterial, Phylogeny, Wolbachia, Isopoda, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review