An exploratory study of cyber hygiene behaviors and knowledge
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There remains a lack of understanding of what type of education might be beneficial to eliminate unethical cyber hygiene behaviour.
“Regardless of the organisation or target, there remains a lack of understanding of what type of education might be beneficial to eliminate unethical cyber hygiene behaviour (Cain et al., 2018)”
From The influence of ethical principles and policy awareness priming on university students’ judgements about ICT code of conduct compliance (2022) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2018
Cites
Security awareness of computer users: A phishing threat avoidance perspective
Arachchilage, N. A. G., & Love, S. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.046 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human Cognition Through the Lens of Social Engineering Cyberattacks
Montañez, R., Golob, E., & Xu, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01755 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Richards, D., Nazeer Khan, S. B., Formosa, P., & Bankins, S. (2022) · Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People · doi:10.1108/ocj-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cain, A. A., Edwards, M. E., & Still, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cain, Ashley A.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Security and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 36-45
- ISSN
- 2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887975821
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 17.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Security and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF (CNS-1659795)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- cyber hygiene, cybersecurity knowledge, user behavior, phishing, cybersecurity training, age differences, gender differences, perceived expertise, cybersecurity breaches, end users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
