Cited by 42Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionCryptographic Implementations and SecurityComputer Science and Engineering

A new parallel processing architecture for accelerating image encryption based on chaos

Open access
Yavuz, Erdem·2021·Journal of Information Security and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jisa.2021.103056

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exploiting parallelism is one possible strategy to increase the throughput of encryption algorithms.

    “One possible strategy to increase the throughput of encryption algorithms is exploiting parallelism [15, 17, 25, 27, 39, 40, 46-48]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yavuz, E.
Venue
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
63
Pages
103056
ISSN
2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214904397
Cited by
42
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Information Security and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Technical University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
Keywords
image encryption, chaos-based cryptography, parallel computing architecture, multi-core processors, loop-level parallelism, secure image transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review