Renal denervation in management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Some, but not all, recent studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) can improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance in people who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of RDN as a treatment for HFrEF.Methods The Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched through to September 28, 2022 for clinical studies that evaluated the effect of RDN on HFrEF. The primary endpoints were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary endpoints were changes in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, left atrial diameter, and interventricular septal thickness. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also evaluated. Major adverse events were defined as death and rehospitalization for heart failure during follow-up. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine level were extracted as measures of renal function.Results Eleven trials comprising 313 patients were eligible for quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed a mean increase in LVEF of 4.25 % (95 % CI 1.77-6.72; p < 0.001, I 2 = 69 %) and an increase in 6MWD (mean difference 50.28 m, 95 % CI 8.78-91.78; p = 0.02; I 2 = 81 %) after RDN. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, left atrial diameter, and interventricular septal thickness also improved after RDN. NT-proBNP, NYHA class, and heart rate were significantly decreased after RDN. There were no significant changes in blood pressure after RDN. Mortality and HF-related hospitalization rates were relatively low. There was no significant change in eGFR or creatinine after RDN.Conclusions Our findings suggest that RDN can effectively increase LVEF and 6MWD in patients with HFrEF but require confirmation in studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A review and meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials of renal denervation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction concluded that the procedure improves left ventricular ejection fraction and increases 6-min walk distance, independent of reductions in blood pressure and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine levels.
“A review and meta-analysis146 of the 11 clinical trials of RDN in patients with HFrEF conducted to date concluded that the procedure improves LVEF and increases the 6-min walk distance in this population. These beneficial effects were independent of reductions in blood pressure and changes in eGFR and creatinine levels.”
From Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception (2025) · cites this paper as [146]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Zhou KW, Zhang G. The prognostic and diagnostic significance of serum BNP level in the classification of heart failure. Chin J Lab Diagn 2020;24:895-9.
- Gao JQYW, Liu ZJ. Percutaneous renal artery sympathetic denervation improves car- diac functions in patients with chronic heart failure. J Clin Cardiol 2015;31:1211-4. (In Chinese).
- Authors
- Li, M., Ma, W., Fan, F., Yi, T., Qiu, L., Wang, Z., Weng, H., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Huo, Y.
- Affiliations
- Peking University First Hospital (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Wei
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 513-521
- ISSN
- 0914-5087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4319455765
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2501106)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- renal denervation, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, left ventricular ejection fraction, 6-minute walk distance, NT-proBNP, NYHA functional class, heart rate, left ventricular remodeling, heart failure hospitalization, renal function, renal sympathetic nerves
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Denervation, Heart Failure, Humans, Kidney, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review