Cited by 239Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI and HR TechnologiesExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review

Open access
P.S., Dr. Varsha·2023·International Journal of Information Management Data Insights

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is similar to human intelligence, and robots in organisations always perform human tasks. However, AI encounters a variety of biases during its operational process in the online economy. The coded algorithms helps in decision-making in firms with a variety of biases and ambiguity. The study is qualitative in nature and asserts that AI biases and vulnerabilities experienced by people across industries lead to gender biases and racial discrimination. Furthermore, the study describes the different types of biases and emphasises the importance of responsible AI in firms in order to reduce the risk from AI. The implications discuss how policymakers, managers, and employees must understand biases to improve corporate fairness and societal well-being. Future research can be carryout on consumer bias, bias in job automation and bias in societal data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rather than engaging consumers as sovereign choosers, the system tests and exploits their cognitive biases, such as scarcity bias and conformity.

    “Rather than engaging consumers as sovereign choosers, the system tests and exploits their cognitive biases, like showing a time-limited discount to trigger a fear-of-missing-out (scarcity bias) or using social comparison info (”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 104 · Cited by 239

Authors
P.S., D. V.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
100165
ISSN
2667-0968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323041949
Cited by
239
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 27
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management Data Insights (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
algorithmic bias, responsible AI, gender bias, racial discrimination, algorithmic decision-making, AI risk management, internet economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review