Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical decision support system: Risk level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules

Open access
Anooj, P.K.·2012·Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.jksuci.2011.09.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As people have interests in their health recently, development of medical domain application has been one of the most active research areas. One example of the medical domain application is the detection system for heart disease based on computer-aided diagnosis methods, where the data are obtained from some other sources and are evaluated based on computer-based applications. Earlier, the use of computer was to build a knowledge based clinical decision support system which uses knowledge from medical experts and transfers this knowledge into computer algorithms manually. This process is time consuming and really depends on medical experts’ opinions which may be subjective. To handle this problem, machine learning techniques have been developed to gain knowledge automatically from examples or raw data. Here, a weighted fuzzy rule-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) is presented for the diagnosis of heart disease, automatically obtaining knowledge from the patient’s clinical data. The proposed clinical decision support system for the risk prediction of heart patients consists of two phases: (1) automated approach for the generation of weighted fuzzy rules and (2) developing a fuzzy rule-based decision support system. In the first phase, we have used the mining technique, attribute selection and attribute weightage method to obtain the weighted fuzzy rules. Then, the fuzzy system is constructed in accordance with the weighted fuzzy rules and chosen attributes. Finally, the experimentation is carried out on the proposed system using the datasets obtained from the UCI repository and the performance of the system is compared with the neural network-based system utilizing accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jksuci.2011.09.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Abbasi, 2006, Clinical decision support systems: a discussion on different methodologies used in health care
  2. Abidin, B., Dom, R.M., Rahman, A.R.A., Bakar, R.A., 2009. Use of fuzzy neural network to predict coronary heart disease in a Malaysian sample. In: Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Telecommunications and Informatics, Istanbul, Turkey, May 30–June 1.
  3. Anderson, 1997, Clearing the way for physicians’ use of clinical information systems, Communication of the ACM, 83, 10.1145/257874.257895 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chen, J., Greiner, R., 1999. Comparing Bayesian network classifiers. In: Proceedings of UAI-99, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 101–108.
  5. De, 2001, An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 117, 209, 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00235-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ephzibah, E.P., 2010. Cost effective approach on feature selection using genetic algorithms and LS-SVM classifier. IJ CA Special Issue on Evolutionary Computation for Optimization Techniques, EC OT.55, pp. 55–56. · doi:10.5120/1532-135
  7. Fidele, 2009, Artificial neural network as a clinical decision-supporting tool to predict cardiovascular disease, Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 4, 36, 10.3923/tasr.2009.36.46 · DOI
  8. Garg, 2005, Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes, Journal of the American Medical Association, PubMed, 293, 1223, 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Han, 2004, Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8, 53, 10.1023/B:DAMI.0000005258.31418.83 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kawamoto, 2005, Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success, BMJ, 330, 765, 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F · DOI · Paper page
  11. Khatibi, 2010, A fuzzy-evidential hybrid inference engine for coronary heart disease risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 8536, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.022 · DOI
  12. Knopp, 2002, Risk factors for coronary artery disease in women, The American Journal of Cardiology, 89, 28, 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02409-8 · DOI
  13. Kong, 2008, Clinical decision support systems: a review on knowledge representation and inference under uncertainties, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 1, 159, 10.2991/ijcis.2008.1.2.6 · DOI
  14. Lin, 2006, Decision Support Systems, 42
  15. Merijohn, 2008, Clinical decision support chairside tools for evidence-based dental practice, The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 8, 119, 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.05.016 · DOI
  16. Miller, 1990, Why the standard view is standard: people, not machines, understand patients’ problems, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15, 581, 10.1093/jmp/15.6.581 · DOI
  17. Miller, 1990, The demise of the “Greek Oracle” model for medical diagnostic systems, Methods of Information in Medicine, 29, 1, 10.1055/s-0038-1634767 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Palaniappan, 2008, Intelligent heart disease prediction system using data mining techniques, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8, 108
  19. Parthiban, 2008, Intelligent heart disease prediction system using CANFIS and genetic algorithm, International Journal of Biological, Biomedical and Medical Sciences, 3, 3
  20. Patil, 2009, Intelligent and effective heart attack prediction system using data mining and artificial neural network, European Journal of Scientific Research, 31, 642
  21. Setiawan, N.A., Venkatachalam, P.A., Hani, A.F.M., 2009. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease using artificial intelligence based decision support system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Machine Systems, Batu Ferringhi, Penang, 11–13 October, 2009.
  22. Shanthi, 2008, Input feature selection using hybrid neuro-genetic approach in the diagnosis of stroke disease, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8, 12
  23. Straszecka, 2007, Combining uncertainty and imprecision in models of medical diagnosis, Information Sciences, 176, 3026, 10.1016/j.ins.2005.12.006 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2005.12.006
  24. Subbalakshmi, 2011, Decision support in heart disease prediction system using naive Bayes, Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), 2, 170
  25. Szolovit, 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine, 34, 111, 10.1055/s-0038-1634594 · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634594
  26. Tang, 2005, A comparative study of medical data classification methods based on decision tree and system reconstruction analysis, IEMS, 4, 102
  27. Thuraisingham, B., 2000. A primer for understanding and applying data mining, IT professional. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 28–31. · DOI
  28. Tsipouras, 2008, Automated diagnosis of coronary artery disease based on data mining and fuzzy modeling, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 12, 447, 10.1109/TITB.2007.907985 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Warren, J., Beliakov, G., Zwaag, B., 2000. Fuzzy logic in clinical practice decision support system. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 4–7 January 2000. · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926789
  30. Yan, H., Zheng, J., Jiang, Y., Peng, C., Li, Q., 2003. Development of a decision support system for heart disease diagnosis using multilayer perceptron. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 25–28, pp. 5, 709–712. · doi:10.1109/iscas.2003.1206411
  31. Zadeh, 1965, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338, 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X · DOI · Paper page
  32. Zhu, W., Zeng, N., Wang, N., 2010. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and roc analysis with practical SAS® implementations. In: NESUG Proceedings: Health Care and Life Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland.

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Anooj, P. K.
Venue
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
27-40
ISSN
1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jksuci.2011.09.002
OpenAlex
W2250033699
Cited by
385
References
2
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical decision support system: Risk level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jksuci.2011.09.002
The paper
Anooj, P. K. (2012). Clinical decision support system: Risk level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2011.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.