CsAGP: Detecting Alzheimer's disease from multimodal images via dual-transformer with cross-attention and graph pooling
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a terrible and degenerative disease commonly occurring in the elderly. Early detection can prevent patients from further damage, which is crucial in treating AD. Over the past few decades, it has been demonstrated that neuroimaging can be a critical diagnostic tool for AD, and the feature fusion of different neuroimaging modalities can enhance diagnostic performance. Most previous studies in multimodal feature fusion have only concatenated the high-level features extracted by neural networks from various neuroimaging images simply. However, a major problem of these studies is over-looking the low-level feature interactions between modalities in the feature extraction stage, resulting in suboptimal performance in AD diagnosis. In this paper, we develop a dual-branch vision transformer with cross-attention and graph pooling, namely CsAGP, which enables multi-level feature interactions between the inputs to learn a shared feature representation. Specifically, we first construct a brand-new cross-attention fusion module (CAFM), which processes MRI and PET images by two independent branches of differing computational complexity. These features are fused merely by the cross-attention mechanism to enhance each other. After that, a concise graph pooling algorithm-based Reshape-Pooling-Reshape (RPR) framework is developed for token selection to reduce token redundancy in the proposed model. Extensive experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database demonstrated that the suggested method obtains 99.04%, 97.43%, 98.57%, and 98.72% accuracy for the classification of AD vs. CN, AD vs. MCI, CN vs. MCI, and AD vs. CN vs. MCI, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multimodal models that assume complete data often suffer a significant performance drop when applied in real-world settings.
“As a result, multimodal models that assume complete data often suffer a significant performance drop when applied in real-world settings.”
From The role of multimodality in clinical disease diagnosis: advances, challenges, and opportunities (2026) · cites this paper as Tang et al. (18)
The Introduction says multimodal images are not always available in practice, and the Experiment results show lower accuracy with one modality than with MRI and PET together. The paper does not show that models designed for complete data suffer a significant performance drop when deployed with incomplete data in real-world settings. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsification
Rao, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, B., Lu, J., Zhou, J., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02034 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
An effective multimodal image fusion method using MRI and PET for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis
Song, J., Zheng, J., Li, P., Lu, X., Zhu, G., & Shen, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.637386 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Multimodal Attention-Based Deep Learning for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
Golovanevsky, M., Eickhoff, C., & Singh, R. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac168 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Feature Fusion for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Zhang, T., & Shi, M. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108795 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- [1]1. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700–789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. 2022. · DOI
- [2]2. Chen C-FR, Fan Q, Panda R. Crossvit: Cross-attention multi-scale vision transformer for image classification; Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision; 2021. pp. 357–366.
- [3]3. Creswell A, White T, Dumoulin V, Arulkumaran K, Sengupta B, Bharath AA. Generative adversarial networks: an overview. IEEE Sig Process Mag. 2018;35(1):53–65.
- [4]4. Dosovitskiy A, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint. 2020:arXiv:2010.11929 · arXiv
- [5]5. Fang X, Liu Z, Xu M. Ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks based multi-modality images for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. IET Image Proc. 2020;14(2):318–326.
- [6]6. Gao X, Shi F, Shen D, Liu M. Task-induced pyramid and attention GAN for multimodal brain image imputation and classification in alzheimer’s disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022;26(1):36–43. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3097721. · DOI
- [8]8. Jang J, Hwang D. M3T: Three-Dimensional Medical Image Classifier Using Multi-Plane and Multi-Slice Transformer; Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2022. pp. 20718–20729.
- [9]9. Jiao Z, Chen S, Shi H, Xu J. Multi-modal feature selection with feature correlation and feature structure fusion for MCI and AD classification. Brain Sci. 2022;12(1):80. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010080. · DOI
- [10]10. Kang L, Jiang J, Huang J, Zhang T. Identifying early mild cognitive impairment by multi-modality MRI-based deep learning. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:206. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00206. · DOI
- [11]11. Khan A, Chefranov A, Demirel H. Image scene geometry recognition using low-level features fusion at multi-layer deep CNN. Neurocomputing. 2021 Jun;440:111–126. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.01.085. · DOI
- [12]12. Kong Z, Zhang M, Zhu W, Yi Y, Wang T, Zhang B. Multimodal data Alzheimer’s disease detection based on 3D convolution. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;75:103565
- [13]13. Kun HAN, Haiwei PAN, Wei Z, Xiaofei B, Chunling C, Shuning HE. Alzheimer’s disease classification method based on multi-modal medical images. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci Technol) 2020;60(8):664–671.
- [14]14. Kushol R, Masoumzadeh A, Huo D, Kalra S, Yang Y-H. Addformer: Alzheimer’s disease detection from structural MRI using fusion transformer; 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2022. pp. 1–5.
- [15]15. Lin W, Gao Q, Du M, Chen W, Tong T. Multiclass diagnosis of stages of Alzheimer’s disease using linear discriminant analysis scoring for multimodal data. Comput Biol Med. 2021;134:104478. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104478. · DOI
- [16]16. Liu M, et al. A multimodel deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2020;208:116459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459. · DOI · Paper page
- [17]17. Liu H, Jin F, Zeng H, Pu H, Fan B. Image Enhancement Guided Object Detection in Visually Degraded Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2023 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3274926. · DOI
- [18]18. Liu Z, Lu H, Pan X, Xu M, Lan R, Luo X. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease via an attention-based multi-scale convolutional neural network. Knowl-Based Syst. 2022;238:107942
- [19]19. Logan R, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks with ensemble learning and generative adversarial networks for Alzheimer’s disease image data classification. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:720226. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.720226. · DOI
- [20]20. Lyu Y, Yu X, Zhu D, Zhang L. Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease via Vision Transformer; Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments; 2022. pp. 463–468.
- [21]21. Meng X, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging neural network-based feature detection for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:911220. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.911220. · DOI
- [22]22. Nan F, et al. A multi-classification accessment framework for reproducible evaluation of multimodal learning in Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2022:1–14. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2022.3204619. · DOI
- [23]23. Pan J, Wang S. Cross-Modal Transformer GAN: A Brain Structure-Function Deep Fusing Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease. arXiv preprint. 2022:arXiv:2206.13393 · arXiv
- [26]26. Richhariya B, Tanveer M, Rashid AH. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using universum support vector machine based recursive feature elimination (USVM-RFE) Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020 May;59 doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101903101903. · DOI
- [27]27. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Gradcam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization; Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision; 2017. pp. 618–626.
- [28]28. Shi Y, et al. ASMFS: Adaptive-similarity-based multi-modality feature selection for classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Pattern Recogn. 2022;126:108566
- [29]29. Shi Y, Suk H-I, Gao Y, Lee S-W, Shen D. Leveraging coupled interaction for multimodal Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst. 2019;31(1):186–200. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2900077. · DOI
- [32]32. Tan H, Bansal M. Lxmert: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers. arXiv preprint. 2019:arXiv:1908.07490 · arXiv
- [33]33. Tu Y, Lin S, Qiao J, Zhuang Y, Zhang P. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis via multimodal feature fusion. Comput Biol Med. 2022;148:105901. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105901. · DOI
- [34]34. Wu C, et al. Discrimination and conversion prediction of mild cognitive impairment using convolutional neural networks. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(10):992. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.10.17. · DOI
- [35]35. Xing X, Liang G, Zhang Y, Khanal S, Lin A-L, Jacobs N. Advit: vision transformer on multi-modality pet images for alzheimer disease diagnosis; 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2022. pp. 1–4.
- [37]37. Zhang J, He X, Qing L, Gao F, Wang B. BPGAN: Brain PET synthesis from MRI using generative adversarial network for multi-modal Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;217:106676. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106676. · DOI
- [38]38. Zhang F, Li Z, Zhang B, Du H, Wang B, Zhang X. Multimodal deep learning model for auxiliary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurocomputing. 2019;361:185–195.
- [39]39. Zhang X, Lin W, Xiao M, Ji H. Multimodal 2.5 D convolutional neural network for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease with magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. Prog Electromagn Res. 2021;171:21–34.
- [41]41. Zhao X, Zhou F, Ou-Yang L, Wang T, Lei B. Graph convolutional network analysis for mild cognitive impairment prediction; 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019); 2019. pp. 1598–1601.
- [42]42. Zhu J, et al. Efficient self-attention mechanism and structural distilling model for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Comput Biol Med. 2022;147:105737. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105737. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Multimodal Fusion–Based Deep Learning for Alzheimer’s Disease
Zhang, R., Sheng, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., & Wang, B. (2025) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.035 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The role of multimodality in clinical disease diagnosis: advances, challenges, and opportunities
Nawaz, A., Edinat, A., Rana, M. R. R., Ali, T., Mustafa, G., Tahir, S., & Lee, S. W. (2026) · Frontiers in public health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1788454 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tang, C., Wei, M., Sun, J., Wang, S., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Junding
- Zhang, Yudong
- Venue
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 101618
- ISSN
- 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7615783
- OpenAlex
- W4380853077
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- British Heart Foundation (AA/18/3/34220)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62276092)
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease detection, multimodal neuroimaging, cross-attention fusion, graph pooling, vision transformer, dual-branch transformer, token selection, early diagnosis, mild cognitive impairment, ADNI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review