The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology
Open accessAbstract
There has been significant development in metal additive manufacturing (MAM) technology over the past few decades, and considerable progress has been made in understanding how various processes and their parameters influence the properties of printed metallic parts. Despite this, the knowledge concerning its characteristics has been dispersed across a variety of publications and sources, making it difficult to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire field, especially for businesses interested in additive manufacturing (AM). In order to bridge this gap, periodic reviews encompassing state-of-the-art as the whole are necessary. Therefore, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the essential features of MAM techniques based on the most recent scientific knowledge. It explores emerging research on four of the most significant technologies, including material extrusion (ME), binder jetting (BJ), powder bed fusion (PBF), and directed energy deposition (DED). As well as providing an outline of fundamental process characteristics, ongoing efforts to optimize them and current challenges, it also highlights gaps in understanding and future research and development needs. A significant feature of this review is the provision of substantial documentation regarding the mechanical properties of materials processed by a variety of commercial systems, including a variety of novel hybrid additive manufacturing (HAM) machines. This is accompanied by an investigation into the most recent works done to characterize the environmental impact along with a conceptual framework for improving the energy efficiency (EE) of the manufacturing process. As a result of reporting on both the characteristics of several MAM processes along with their sustainability features in one integrated article, it is anticipated that this information will serve as a valuable resource for both the academic and manufacturing communities to better appreciate and understand what differentiates MAM from traditional manufacturing (TM) processes, thus facilitating its future advancement and adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Additive manufacturing of metals
Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., & Emmelmann, C. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 · Cited by 4,759
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010) · National University of Singapore · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 · Cited by 2,969
Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 · Cited by 2,557
The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing
Sames, W. J., List, F. A., Pannala, S., Dehoff, R. R., & Babu, S. S. (2016) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 · Cited by 2,529
Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review
Blakey-Milner, B., Gradl, P., Snedden, G., Brooks, M., Pitot, J., Lopez, E., Leary, M., Berto, F., & du Plessis, A. (2021) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 3×
“Powder-based materials are most commonly used, although wire is also used in some cases; both materials are processed by melting or sintering, followed by solidification using energy sources such as lasers, electron beams, or heated nozzles [8].”
Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities
Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O’Donoghue, L., & Charitidis, C. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 · Cited by 2,136
Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing
Williams, S., Martina, F., Addison, A. C., Ding, J., Pardal, G., & Colegrove, P. A. (2015) · Materials Science and Technology · doi:10.1179/1743284715y.0000000073 · Cited by 1,971
Carroll, B. E., Palmer, T. A., & Beese, A. M. (2015) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 · Cited by 1,507
Kok, Y., Tan, X. P., Wang, P., Nai, M. L. S., Loh, N. H., Liu, E., & Tor, S. B. (2018) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021 · Cited by 1,447
Cited by
Ni, B., Glaser, B., & Taheri-Mousavi, S. M. (2025) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01768-2 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, M., Mehrabi, H., & Naveed, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 84
- Pages
- 1001-1029
- ISSN
- 1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4308219552
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 34.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060
- The paper
- Armstrong, M., Mehrabi, H., & Naveed, N. (2022). An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.