Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: Current situation and future perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is attracting the increasing attention of materials community for its excellent capability of generating required contents. With the introduction of Prompt paradigm and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), GAI shifts from the task-specific to general pattern gradually, enabling to tackle multiple complicated tasks involved in resolving the structure-activity relationships. Here, we review the development status of GAI comprehensively and analyze pros and cons of various generative models in the view of methodology. The applications of task-specific generative models involving materials inverse design and data augmentation are also dissected. Taking ChatGPT as an example, we explore the potential applications of general GAI in generating multiple materials content, solving differential equation as well as querying materials FAQs. Furthermore, we summarize six challenges encountered for the use of GAI in materials science and provide the corresponding solutions. This work paves the way for providing effective and explainable materials data generation and analysis approaches to accelerate the materials research and development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The energy required to run LLMs and associated web-serving infrastructure is a limitation.
“Adding to that, another limitation is the energy required to run LLMs and the associated web-serving infrastructure (Liu et al. 2023a ).”
From A review of LLMs and their applications in the architecture, engineering and construction industry (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al. 2023a
Cites
Improved training of Wasserstein GANs
Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.00028 · Cited by 6,800 · see citing works
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560815 · Cited by 4,361 · see citing works
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.13586 · Cited by 4,352 · see citing works
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208 · see citing works
Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis
Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05233 · Cited by 3,362 · see citing works
Neural ordinary differential equations
Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.07366 · Cited by 2,097 · see citing works
Materials discovery and design using machine learning
Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Ju, W., & Shi, S. (2017) · Journal of Materiomics · doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 · Cited by 1,276 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15080260 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14010220 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
A review of LLMs and their applications in the architecture, engineering and construction industry
Kampelopoulos, D., Tsanousa, A., Vrochidis, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11241-7 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Language models for materials discovery and sustainability: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
Pei, Z., Yin, J., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101495 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xiao, F., Yang, W., Ding, Y., Li, X., Zhang, K., & Liu, J. (2025) · Battery Energy · doi:10.1002/bte2.20240036 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Generative AI for crystal structures: A review
De Breuck, P.-P., Wang, H.-C., Rignanese, G.-M., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2025) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01881-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Yang, Z., Yu, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, D., Lin, H., Li, M., Ma, S., Avdeev, M., & Shi, S.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University (CN)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Shi, Siqi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Materiomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 798-816
- ISSN
- 2352-8478 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4378188762
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 21.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Materiomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Institutional Repository (The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52073169, 92270124)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3802101)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- generative AI, materials science, reinforcement learning from human feedback, data augmentation, ChatGPT, structure-activity relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review