Cited by 294Machine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: Current situation and future perspectives

Open access
Liu, Yue, Yang, Zhengwei, Yu, Zhenyao, Liu, Zitu, Liu, Dahui, Lin, Hailong, Li, Mingqing, Ma, Shuchang +2 more·2023·Journal of Materiomics

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is attracting the increasing attention of materials community for its excellent capability of generating required contents. With the introduction of Prompt paradigm and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), GAI shifts from the task-specific to general pattern gradually, enabling to tackle multiple complicated tasks involved in resolving the structure-activity relationships. Here, we review the development status of GAI comprehensively and analyze pros and cons of various generative models in the view of methodology. The applications of task-specific generative models involving materials inverse design and data augmentation are also dissected. Taking ChatGPT as an example, we explore the potential applications of general GAI in generating multiple materials content, solving differential equation as well as querying materials FAQs. Furthermore, we summarize six challenges encountered for the use of GAI in materials science and provide the corresponding solutions. This work paves the way for providing effective and explainable materials data generation and analysis approaches to accelerate the materials research and development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Yang, Z., Yu, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, D., Lin, H., Li, M., Ma, S., Avdeev, M., & Shi, S.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Shi, Siqi
Venue
Journal of Materiomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
798-816
ISSN
2352-8478 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378188762
Cited by
294
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 10
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Materiomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Institutional Repository (The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52073169, 92270124)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3802101)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
generative AI, materials science, reinforcement learning from human feedback, data augmentation, ChatGPT, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review