The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temperature and stress distribution in ultrasonic metal welding—An FEA-based study
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference between the two Al-Cu interfaces is attributed to non-uniform thermo-mechanical conditions at the interface during ultrasonic metal welding.
“The subtle difference between the interfaces is attributed to non-uniform thermo-mechanical conditions at the interface during the ultrasonic metal welding process [86] .”
From Interdiffusion of Elements During Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (2021) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- ASM Hand Book, 1990, vol. 1
- ASM Hand Book, 1998, vol. 2
- Daniels, 1965, Ultrasonic welding, J. Ultrason., 190, 10.1016/0041-624X(65)90169-1 · DOI
- De Vries, E., 2004. Mechanics and Mechanism of Ultrasonic Metal Welding, Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
- Ding, 2001, Numerical analysis of ultrasonic wire bonding: effects of bonding parameters on contact pressure and frictional energy, Mech. Mater., 38, 11, 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.007 · DOI
- Hazlett, 1970, Additional studies on interface temperatures and bonding mechanisms of ultrasonic welds, Weld. Res. Suppl., 49, 196
- Jeng, 2001, A micro contact approach for ultrasonic wire bonding in microelectronics, J. Tribol., 123, 725, 10.1115/1.1352744 · DOI
- Joshi, 1971, The formation of ultrasonic bond between metals, Weld. J., 50, 840
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interdiffusion of Elements During Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing
Pagan, M., Petrie, C., Leonard, D., Sridharan, N., Zinkle, S., & Babu, S. S. (2021) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · doi:10.1007/s11661-020-06131-2 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Elangovan, S., Semeer, S., & Prakasan, K.
- Affiliations
- PSG College of Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Prakasan, K.
- ORCID
- Elangovan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Processing Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1143-1150
- ISSN
- 0924-0136 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021567476
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Processing Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
- Keywords
- ultrasonic metal welding, temperature distribution, stress distribution, sonotrode, weld interface, clamping force, friction coefficient, material thickness, weld strength, finite element analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
