The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The quality of powder layers, specifically their packing density and surface uniformity, is a critical factor influencing the quality of components produced by powder bed metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes, including selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting. The present work employs a computational model to study the critical influence of powder cohesiveness on the powder recoating process in AM. The model is based on the discrete element method (DEM) with particle-to-particle and particle-to-wall interactions involving frictional contact, rolling resistance and cohesive forces. Quantitative metrics, namely the spatial mean values and standard deviations of the packing fraction and surface profile field, are defined in order to evaluate powder layer quality. Based on these metrics, the size-dependent behavior of exemplary plasma-atomized Ti–6Al–4V powders during the recoating process is studied. It is found that decreased particle size (increased cohesiveness) leads to considerably decreased powder layer quality in terms of low, strongly varying packing fractions and highly non-uniform surface profiles. For relatively fine-grained powders (median particle diameter 17 μm), it is shown that cohesive forces dominate gravity forces by two orders of magnitude leading to low quality powder layers not suitable for subsequent laser melting without additional layer/surface finishing steps. Besides particle-to-particle adhesion, this contribution quantifies the influence of mechanical powder material properties, nominal layer thickness, blade velocity, as well as particle-to-wall adhesion. Finally, the implications of the resulting powder layer characteristics on the subsequent melting process are discussed and practical recommendations are given for the choice of powder recoating process parameters. While the present study focuses on a rigid blade recoating mechanism, the proposed simulation framework can be applied to systems using alternative recoating tools such as soft blades, rakes or rotating rollers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies
Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. D. L. (1979) · Géotechnique · doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 · Cited by 17,527
Intermolecular and Surface Forces
(2011) · Intermolecular and Surface Forces · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-391927-4.10024-6 · Cited by 16,923
Intermolecular and Surface Forces
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2011-0-05119-0 · Cited by 8,968
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010) · National University of Singapore · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 · Cited by 2,969
A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V
Thijs, L., Verhaeghe, F., Craeghs, T., Humbeeck, J. V., & Kruth, J.-P. (2010) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 · Cited by 2,929
Khairallah, S. A., Anderson, A. T., Rubenchik, A., & King, W. E. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 · Cited by 2,766
The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing
Sames, W. J., List, F. A., Pannala, S., Dehoff, R. R., & Babu, S. S. (2016) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 · Cited by 2,529
Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing
Kruth, J.-P., Levy, G., Klocke, F., & Childs, T. H. C. (2007) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004 · Cited by 1,444
Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
Kruth, J., Mercelis, P., Van Vaerenbergh, J., Froyen, L., & Rombouts, M. (2005) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540510573365 · Cited by 1,383
Is Random Close Packing of Spheres Well Defined?
Torquato, S., Truskett, T. M., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2064 · Cited by 1,379
Metadata
- Authors
- Meier, C., Weissbach, R., Weinberg, J., Wall, W. A., & Hart, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Processing Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 266
- Pages
- 484-501
- ISSN
- 0924-0136 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797433630
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037
- The paper
- Meier, C., Weissbach, R., Weinberg, J., Wall, W. A., & Hart, A. J. (2019). Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.