Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing

Open access
Meier, Christoph, Weissbach, Reimar, Weinberg, Johannes, Wall, Wolfgang A., Hart, A. John·2019·Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Abstract

Abstract The quality of powder layers, specifically their packing density and surface uniformity, is a critical factor influencing the quality of components produced by powder bed metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes, including selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting. The present work employs a computational model to study the critical influence of powder cohesiveness on the powder recoating process in AM. The model is based on the discrete element method (DEM) with particle-to-particle and particle-to-wall interactions involving frictional contact, rolling resistance and cohesive forces. Quantitative metrics, namely the spatial mean values and standard deviations of the packing fraction and surface profile field, are defined in order to evaluate powder layer quality. Based on these metrics, the size-dependent behavior of exemplary plasma-atomized Ti–6Al–4V powders during the recoating process is studied. It is found that decreased particle size (increased cohesiveness) leads to considerably decreased powder layer quality in terms of low, strongly varying packing fractions and highly non-uniform surface profiles. For relatively fine-grained powders (median particle diameter 17 μm), it is shown that cohesive forces dominate gravity forces by two orders of magnitude leading to low quality powder layers not suitable for subsequent laser melting without additional layer/surface finishing steps. Besides particle-to-particle adhesion, this contribution quantifies the influence of mechanical powder material properties, nominal layer thickness, blade velocity, as well as particle-to-wall adhesion. Finally, the implications of the resulting powder layer characteristics on the subsequent melting process are discussed and practical recommendations are given for the choice of powder recoating process parameters. While the present study focuses on a rigid blade recoating mechanism, the proposed simulation framework can be applied to systems using alternative recoating tools such as soft blades, rakes or rotating rollers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Metadata

Authors
Meier, C., Weissbach, R., Weinberg, J., Wall, W. A., & Hart, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
266
Pages
484-501
ISSN
0924-0136 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797433630
Cited by
298
References
46
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037
The paper
Meier, C., Weissbach, R., Weinberg, J., Wall, W. A., & Hart, A. J. (2019). Critical influences of particle size and adhesion on the powder layer uniformity in metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.