Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,055

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences

Open access
Kanehisa, Minoru, Sato, Yoko, Morishima, Kanae·2016·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA are automatic annotation servers for genome and metagenome sequences, which perform KO (KEGG Orthology) assignments to characterize individual gene functions and reconstruct KEGG pathways, BRITE hierarchies and KEGG modules to infer high-level functions of the organism or the ecosystem. Both servers are made freely available at the KEGG Web site (http://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/). In BlastKOALA, the KO assignment is performed by a modified version of the internally used KOALA algorithm after the BLAST search against a non-redundant dataset of pangenome sequences at the species, genus or family level, which is generated from the KEGG GENES database by retaining the KO content of each taxonomic category. In GhostKOALA, which utilizes more rapid GHOSTX for database search and is suitable for metagenome annotation, the pangenome dataset is supplemented with Cd-hit clusters including those for viral genes. The result files may be downloaded and manipulated for further KEGG Mapper analysis, such as comparative pathway analysis using multiple BlastKOALA results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Kanehisa, 2014, Data, information, knowledge and principle: Back to metabolism in KEGG, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D199, 10.1093/nar/gkt1076 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pearson, 1991, Searching protein sequence libraries: Comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA algorithms, Genomics, 11, 635, 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90071-L · DOI · Paper page
  3. Nakaya, 2013, KEGG OC: A large-scale automatic construction of taxonomy-based ortholog clusters, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D353, 10.1093/nar/gks1239 · DOI
  4. Moriya, 2007, KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W182, 10.1093/nar/gkm321 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Aziz, 2008, The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology, BMC Genomics, 9, 75, 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Meyer, 2008, The metagenomics RAST server—A public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes, BMC Bioinf., 9, 386, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Tatusova, 2014, RefSeq microbial genomes database: New representation and annotation strategy, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D553, 10.1093/nar/gkt1274 · DOI · Paper page
  8. UniProt Consortium, 2015, UniProt: A hub for protein information, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D204, 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Li, 2006, Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 22, 1658, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Finn, 2014, Pfam: The protein families database, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D222, 10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Suzuki, 2014, GHOSTX: An improved sequence homology search algorithm using a query suffix array and a database suffix array, PLoS One, 9, e103833, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103833 · DOI
  12. Choe, 2015, Complete genome of Kangiella geojedonensis KCTC 23420T, putative evidence for recent genome reduction in marine environments, Mar. Genomics, 10.1016/j.margen.2015.05.015 · doi:10.1016/j.margen.2015.05.015
  13. McDonald, 2009, ExplorEnz: The primary source of the IUBMB enzyme list, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D593, 10.1093/nar/gkn582 · DOI
  14. Heliconius Genome Consortium, 2012, Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species, Nature, 487, 94, 10.1038/nature11041 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bork, 2015, Tara Oceans. Tara Oceans studies plankton at planetary scale. Introduction, Science, 348, 873, 10.1126/science.aac5605 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 4,055

Metadata

Authors
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., & Morishima, K.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
428
Issue
4
Pages
726-731
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178043251
Cited by
4,055
References
1
FWCI
44.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
National Bioscience Database Center of the Japan Science and Technology Agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006
The paper
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., & Morishima, K. (2016). BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.